Improving Safety of Diagnosis and Therapy in the Inpatient Setting
- Conditions
- Leg PainCOPDSoft Tissue InfectionsCoughDyspneaProtein-Calorie MalnutritionDeep Vein ThrombosisConfusionMental Status ChangeBack Pain
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational CurriculumBehavioral: Diagnostic TimeoutBehavioral: Patient Diagnostic (Dx) QuestionnaireBehavioral: Enhancements to Epic-integrated Quality & Safety Dashboard
- Registration Number
- NCT04393909
- Lead Sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Brief Summary
To improve the safety of diagnosis and therapy for a set of conditions and undifferentiated symptoms for hospitalized patients, the investigators will employ a set of methods and tools from the disciplines of systems engineering, human factors, quality improvement,and data analytics to thoroughly analyze the problem, design and develop potential solutions that leverage existing current technological infrastructure, and implement and evaluate the final interventions. The investigators will engage the interdisciplinary care team and patient (or their caregivers) to ensure treatment trajectories match the anticipated course for working diagnoses (or symptoms), and whether they are in line with patient and clinician expectations. The investigators will use an Interrupted time series (ITS) design to assess impact on diagnostic errors that lead to patient harm. The investigators will perform quantitative and qualitative evaluations using implementation science principles to understand if the interventions worked, and why or why not.
- Detailed Description
The goal of this study is to improve the safety of diagnosis and therapy for a set of conditions and undifferentiated symptoms for hospitalized patients. The investigators will employ a set of methods and tools from the disciplines of systems engineering, human factors, quality improvement, and implementation science to thoroughly analyze the problem, design and develop potential solutions that leverage the current technological infrastructure, and implement and evaluate the final interventions.
The aims of this study are to:
1. Analyze the problem of diagnostic error over the acute episode of care, identifying system and cognitive factors for a set of morbid, costly common conditions and undifferentiated symptoms by using system engineering and human factors methods, as well as electronic health record and administrative data review.
2. Design, develop, and iteratively refine intervention components using lessons learned from problem analysis and a participatory process that involves patients, clinicians, and institutional stakeholders.
3. Implement an intervention for patient and clinician subjects on general medicine units. Using a pre-post, interrupted time series study design, the investigators will evaluate the effect of the intervention primarily on diagnostic and therapeutic errors. The investigators will use mixed methods to understand barriers and facilitators of implementation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 700
- Age 18 or older
- Adult patients admitted to General Medicine Services at Brigham and Women's Hospital during the 21-months study data collection period
- English speakers
- Patients who were diagnosed with any of the following conditions and symptoms upon admission:
- Abdominal pain
- Altered mental status/ delirium / confusion
- Asthma / chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Cellulitis / soft tissue infection
- Chest pain
- Cough
- Deep vein thrombosis / pulmonary embolism / venous thromboembolism
- Dyspnea / short of breath
- Failure to thrive
- Pneumonia
- Protein-calorie malnutrition
- Sepsis
- Other conditions typical of general medicine patients
- Not pregnant women, prisoners and institutionalized individuals
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patient Dx Questionnaire User group Enhancements to Epic-integrated Quality & Safety Dashboard Patient enrollees will be randomized to receive the Patient Dx Questionnaire administered by the research staff at the bedside. Control group Enhancements to Epic-integrated Quality & Safety Dashboard Patients do not have access to the Patient Dx Questionnaire. Control group Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational Curriculum Patients do not have access to the Patient Dx Questionnaire. Patient Dx Questionnaire User group Diagnostic Timeout Patient enrollees will be randomized to receive the Patient Dx Questionnaire administered by the research staff at the bedside. Control group Diagnostic Timeout Patients do not have access to the Patient Dx Questionnaire. Patient Dx Questionnaire User group Patient Diagnostic (Dx) Questionnaire Patient enrollees will be randomized to receive the Patient Dx Questionnaire administered by the research staff at the bedside. Patient Dx Questionnaire User group Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational Curriculum Patient enrollees will be randomized to receive the Patient Dx Questionnaire administered by the research staff at the bedside.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic error 30 days (at most) from admission to the hospital Data Source: Chart audit
Analytic Variables:
* % patients with diagnostic error
* % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE (i.e., harmful DE)
* % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE that was severe (i.e., harmful and severe DE)
* % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE that was preventable (i.e., harmful, severe, and preventable DE)"Safe diagnosis" 30 days (at most) from admission to the hospital Data Source: Chart audit
Analytic variables:
• % patients with correct diagnosis or therapy established within 24 hours of admission
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Healthcare resource utilization 30 days after discharge from the hospital Data Source: EDW (enterprise data warehouse)
Analytic variables:
• % patients with ≥ 1 unscheduled ED visit or readmissionPatient satisfaction 30 days after discharge from the hospital HCAPHS (the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems)patient satisfaction survey: The survey is composed of 27 items: 18 substantive items that encompass critical aspects of the hospital experience (communication with doctors, communication with nurses, responsiveness of hospital staff, cleanliness of the hospital environment, quietness of the hospital environment, pain management, communication about medicines, discharge information, overall rating of hospital, and recommendation of hospital).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States