MedPath

Comparison of Sonographic and MRI Weight Estimation in Fetuses with Suspected Macrosomia

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Accuracy of Sonographic Vs MRI Fetal Weight Estimation
Registration Number
NCT06898892
Lead Sponsor
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy.

Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and the actual birthweight will be recorded and compared with the fetal weight estimations

Detailed Description

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy.

Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and the actual birthweight will be recorded and compared with the fetal weight estimations inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies at term, suspected fetal macrosomia (\>4000 gr in non GDM and \>3800 gr. in GDM cases exclusion criteria-fetal anomaly, PPROM, multiple gestation The radiologist and the sonographer will be blinded to the fetal weight estimation and to the other estimation done

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

singleton pregnancy at term, suspected fetal macrosomia,

Exclusion Criteria
  • fetal anomaly multiple pregnancy PROM

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MRI fetal weight estimation accuracyfrom enollment to Performing the MRI at 1 week

gram

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Galilee medical center

🇮🇱

Nahariyya, Israel

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath