跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05987839
NCT05987839已完成不适用

Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Peking University Third Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 130 人开始时间: 2022年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
130
试验地点
1
主要终点
rate of alignment inlier

研究概览

简要总结

Purpose: A robotic system was recently introduced to improve prosthetic alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) study was to determine whether robotic-arm-assisted TKA improves the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients compared to conventional TKA.

Methods: One hundred and thirty patients who underwent primary TKA were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter RCT conducted in 3 hospitals. Five patients were lost to follow-up at 6 weeks after surgery. Therefore, 125 patients (63 in the intervention group and 62 in the control group) remained in the final analysis. The primary outcome was the rate of patients whose mechanical axis of the femur was less than 3° deviated from the mechanical axis of the tibia evaluated by full-length weight-bearing X-rays of the lower limb at 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will include operation times, 6-week postoperative functional outcomes evaluated by the American Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), SF-36, adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Hypothesis: Robotic-arm-assisted TKA is safe and effective as demonstrated in this trial.

详细描述

  1. Materials and methods 2.1 Study design Our study was a prospective, multicenter and randomized controlled trial that was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University Third Hospital (IRB # 2022-134-02), the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (IRB # 2022-QX-S003-01) and Chifeng Municipal Hospital (IRB # 2022-LLSCGVK4-101-06). All patients had provided written informed consent.

2.2 Patient recruitment From November 2022 to May 2023, a total of 130 patients were randomized into two groups - 65 patients underwent robotic-assisted TKA and 65 underwent conventional TKA. The inclusion criteria were as follows: older than 18 years old and younger than 80 years old with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary and unilateral TKA; after receiving both an oral and a written explanation of the study protocol, they provided written informed consent that they were willing to complete all of the assessments and potential interventions. The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with infection, severe systemic disease (severe diabetes, severe osteoporosis, severe muscle loss, etc.), neuromuscular dysfunction of lower limbs, who are allergic to metal implants, participated in other clinical studies, whose knee joint has been fused for a long time without pain or deformity, unable to tolerate surgery on a systemic assessment, women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who expect to give birth during the clinical period, and there are other factors that affect the efficacy of observation in this study. All operations were performed by experienced surgeons for the conventional and robotic-assisted groups at three hospitals. All patients who underwent TKA with the robotic-assisted or conventional operations underwent the radiologic and clinical assessment.

Main effectiveness evaluation index The main evaluation index of the knee navigation and positioning system clinical trial was the proportion of subjects whose mechanical axis of the femoris deviated from the mechanical axis of the tibia by ≤3° on the full-length lower extremity weight-bearing X-ray at 6 weeks (±2 weeks) after surgery.

X-ray shooting requirements: Full-length weight-bearing X-ray of both lower limbs, that is, X-ray of both lower limbs including hip joint, full length of femur, knee joint, full length of tibia and fibula and ankle joint taken by the patient in the standing state. Key points: The patient stands upright on the camera frame, the back is close to the camera frame, the hands naturally droop, the knee joint is as straight as possible, the feet are the same width as the shoulders, and the internal rotation is about 15°, so that the small head of the fibula overlaps with the tibia nearly one-third, and the patella is pointed vertically in front.

The lower limb force line was evaluated by non-surgeon.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • older than 18 years old and younger than 80 years old with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary and unilateral TKA
  • after receiving both an oral and a written explanation of the study protocol, they provided written informed consent that they were willing to complete all of the assessments and potential interventions

排除标准

  • Allergic to metal implants
  • Any active systemic and local infection
  • Paralysis of muscles around the knee joint or neuropathic arthropathy
  • The knee joint has been fused for a long time without pain and deformity
  • Patients with severe systemic diseases (severe diabetes, severe osteoporosis, severe muscle loss, etc.), or those who cannot tolerate surgery through systemic evaluation
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who expect to give birth during the clinical period
  • Patients who are also participating in other clinical studies
  • In any case, if the investigator believes that the patient is not suitable for this treatment (the patient's expectations are unrealistic or the patient has significant emotional problems)
  • There are other factors that affect the efficacy of observation in this study

结局指标

主要结局

rate of alignment inlier

时间窗: 6 weeks postoperatively

the rate of patients whose mechanical axis of the femur was less than 3° deviated from the mechanical axis of the tibia evaluated by full-length weight-bearing X-rays of the lower limb at 6 weeks postoperatively

次要结局

  • adverse events(up to 6 weeks after the surgery)
  • knee society score(through study completion, an average of 6 weeks after the surgery)
  • SF-36(through study completion, an average of 6 weeks after the surgery)
  • operation time(Intraoperative)
  • serious adverse events(up to 6 weeks after the surgery)
  • the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(through study completion, an average of 6 weeks after the surgery)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验