Dose Escalated Adaptive RadioTherapy in Definitive Chemo-radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

Not Applicable

Terminated

• Conditions: Esophageal Cancer
• Interventions: Radiation: Radiotherapy dose escalation

• Registration Number: NCT04086901
• Lead Sponsor: University of Aarhus

Brief Summary

In Denmark, 1000 new cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer occur every year. Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies

This study will examine the effect of escalation of increasing the radiation dose to the most Positron Emissions Tomografi (PET) avid part of the tumour and lymph nodes compared to a standard uniform dose distribution.

Detailed Description

In Denmark, there are almost 900 new cases of oesphageal and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer per year, with a 5-year survival rate below 20% for the entire group and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 40% for the curatively treated patients.

Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies.

Survival is affected by several factors like stage, gender and comorbidity, but also by lack of local and regional tumour control. Several studies examined pattern of failure in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Most patients experience local failure, and most local failures were located in the Gross Tumor volume (GTV). These findings imply that future therapeutic strategies should focus on improving local control in order to increase successful treatment outcome, although care should be taken to ensure that this does not come at the cost of excess treatment related toxicity.

Strategies to overcome in-GTV failures include radiotherapy-sensitizing agents and dose escalation, the latter has been evaluated in several studies with heterogeneous results.

The role of Positron Emissions Tomografi/ComputerTomografi (PET/CT) in radiotherapy planning has been examined and the diagnostic value of PET/CT in oesophageal cancer is widely accepted, whereas the role in assessing tumour response to treatment is less well established. Flour-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG)-PET scans allow for measurement of changes in tumour cell metabolism that precede changes in tumour size, and reduction in FDG uptake during neoadjuvant therapy has been correlated with favourable outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer.

PET-positive areas have been suggested as suitable targets for dose-escalation strategies, since studies suggested that high FDG uptake on pre-treatment PET/CT identifies tumour sub-volumes that are at greater risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

The major concern in a dose escalation study is severe and potentially lethal normal tissue complications. Oesophageal cancer irradiation usually results in irradiation of the oesophagus, lungs and heart due to the anatomical tumour location, which may result in acute toxicities dominated by radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis (leading to inappropriate nutricial intake). Late toxicities include oesophageal fistula/ulcers, cardiac events, pulmonary fibrosis, or even deaths related to radiation exposure. Dose gradients between the target and normal tissue may be sharp, in order to limit the norml tissue dose and hence the risk of unacceptable toxicity, while maintaining high doses to the tumour.

Current study Previous studies have suggested that escalating the radiation dose to the GTV may provide improved local control, but requires great caution in relation to normal tissue irradiation to avoid unacceptable side effects. The investigators propose a study approach where both requirements will be met. FDG-PET scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the GTV will be escalated to a high dose (63Gray (Gy) in the FDG-PET avid areas in the primary tumour and 60 Gy in the lymph nodes) while Clinical target volume (CTV) and Planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose. The patients will be randomized between this dose-escalated arm and a standard arm with 50Gy in 25 fractions. The total number of fractions will be 25 in both arms. Dose escalation will be limited by normal tissues constraints.

The study will be conducted with modern state-of-the-art radiotherapy techniques, including advanced dose calculation algorithms, daily image guidance, and adaptation of the treatment plan during treatment if needed. The participating centres must implement and comply with a quality assurance program in order to maintain high treatment quality in the study.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-08-22
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-09-10
• Study First Posted: 2019-09-12
• Study Start: 2020-01-01
• Status Verified: 2021-03
• Primary Completion: 2021-03-01
• Study Completion: 2021-03-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-03-05
• Last Update Posted: 2021-03-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: TERMINATED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 3

Inclusion Criteria

The patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be included in the study:

• Patients with histologically verified squamous cell or adenocarcinoma (including signet cell carcinoma) of the oesophagus or GEJ.

• Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) assessment and treatment recommendation; deemed nonresectable and/or inoperable.

• TNM stage (8th edition): cT1-4a or cN+, cM0-1 (M1 disease limited to metastatic lymph nodes)

• Age ≥18 years.

• Performance status ≤2.

• Adequate cardiac, lung and renal function measured according to local guidelines.

• Adequate laboratory findings:

  • haematological: haemoglobin > 90 g/L, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 75 x 109/L
  • hepatic: bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, ALAT ≤ 3 x ULN
  • renal: creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN

• Suitability to undergo curatively intended chemoradiation therapy.

• Ability to adhere to procedures for study and follow-up.

• Women must present a negative pregnancy test. Fertile men and women must use effective contraception. Fertile women included in the study must use oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, depot injection of progestin subdermal implantation, a hormonal vaginal ring, or transdermal patch during the study treatment and one month after.

• Signed informed consent to participate in the study, including acceptance that dose plan and scans will be stored in a national dose plan bank, and the remaining data stored in a central database.

• A standard plan for radiotherapy with homogenous 50 Gy / 25 fractions, meeting all dose constraints for normal tissue, must be achievable.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who will meet one or more of the following exclusion criteria cannot be included in this study:

• Prior oncological treatment or surgical resection for the present disease
• Broncho-pulmonary fistula verified by bronchoscopy
• Any other active malignancies which may compromise study protocol or endpoints except for basal or squamous cell skin cancer
• Any unstable systemic disease (including clinically significant cardiovascular disease, unstable angina, New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade III-IV congestive heart, severe hepatic, renal or metabolic disease or active inflammatory bowel disease)
• Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy greater than grade 1 (CTCAE version 4.03)
• Any other serious or uncontrolled illness which in the opinion of the investigator makes it undesirable for the patient to enter the trial
• Severely decreased lung function

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Dose escalation Arm	Radiotherapy dose escalation	Chemo-radiotherapy with radiotherapy dose escalation based on Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG/PET) scans

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Loco-regional control	12 months	Loco-regional control evaluated with Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Overall survival	1 and 5 years	Number of patients surviving
Progression-free survival	1 and 5 years	Survival without disease progression
Pattern of failure in CTV	5 years	Number of Participants with failure in the clinical target volume (CTV)
Pattern of failure outside PTV	5 years	Number of Participants with failure in the outside the Planning target volume (PTV)
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, shape	12 months	Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of shape
Pattern of failure in GTV-T	5 years	Number of Participants with failure in the Gross tumor volume-tumor (GTV-T)
Dose distributions	6 months	V5, V10, V15, V20, V25, V30, V35, V40, V45 and V50 for all organs at risk will be compared between proton therapy (in silico) and (clinical) IMRT/VMAT photon therapy.
Correlation between loco-regional progression after treatment and changes in FDG-PET uptake pattern during standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy.	12 months	Response will be measured based on PERCIST and using radiomics characterizing the tumour in terms of uptake intensity, shape, and volumes.
Treatment completion rate	12 months	Number of patients completing all radiotherapy treatments and receiving at least one cycle of chemotherapy
Acute and late toxicity	5 years	Acute and late toxicity during and after treatment and at follow-up visits
Hospitalization	12 months	Time spent at hospital and number of hospitalizations due to radiation-induced toxicity
Mean and maximum dose distributions	6 months	Mean and maximum doses for all organs at risk will be compared between proton therapy (in silico) and (clinical) IMRT/VMAT photon therapy.
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, intensity	12 months	Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of intensity
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, heterogeniety	12 months	Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of heterogeniety
Pattern of failure in GTV-N	5 years	Number of Participants with failure in the Gross tumor volume-nodes (GTV-N)
Pattern of failure in GTV-PET	5 years	Number of Participants with failure in Gross tumor volume-PET avid (GTV-PET)
Pattern of failure in PTV	5 years	Number of Participants with failure in the Planning target volume (PTV)

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Odense Universityhospital; 🇩🇰 Odense, Fyn, Denmark

Rigshospitalet; 🇩🇰 Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark

Aarhus University Hospital; 🇩🇰 Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark