MedPath

Estimate the Effect of aPDT on Root Canal Disinfection

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Root Canal Disinfection
Interventions
Procedure: Rubber dam isolation
Device: aPDT
Drug: 2.5%NaClO
Procedure: root canal preparation
Procedure: root canal obturation
Registration Number
NCT02929927
Lead Sponsor
Fujian Medical University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect of traditional root canal disinfection and aPDT on root canal disinfection. And provide the reference for clinical application and experience.

Detailed Description

The study of groups:

Group1: Calcium hydroxide-based antibacterial dressing - two session root canal treatment Group2: aPDT - one session root canal treatment Microbiological measurement. Filled with sterile PBS, the root canals were sampled immediately before and after the disinfection procedures.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria

Good general health, without syndromes or chronic systemic diseases; tooth with single root canal; a diagnosis of chronic periapical periodontitis; the lesions of the root tip was less than 6mm; recently (3months)did not take antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria

Refused to sign the informed consent document; systemic condition; uncooperative behavior; periodontal-endodontic lesions; allergic to photosensitizer; root apical absorption or destroy; A root canal anatomy of risk factors for the difficulty score ≧ 2

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control group1% iodine tinctureRubber dam isolation, tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO, 17% EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, then take the sample again, drying the canal and fill the canal with a commercial calcium hydroxide-based paste. After 2 weeks, the canals were filled with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Experimental group1% iodine tinctureRubber dam isolation,tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO for 1 min, then 17%EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, drying the canal, aPDT, then take the sample again. then dried the canals and filled the canals with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Experimental groupRubber dam isolationRubber dam isolation,tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO for 1 min, then 17%EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, drying the canal, aPDT, then take the sample again. then dried the canals and filled the canals with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Experimental group2.5%NaClORubber dam isolation,tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO for 1 min, then 17%EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, drying the canal, aPDT, then take the sample again. then dried the canals and filled the canals with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Control grouproot canal preparationRubber dam isolation, tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO, 17% EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, then take the sample again, drying the canal and fill the canal with a commercial calcium hydroxide-based paste. After 2 weeks, the canals were filled with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Control groupRubber dam isolationRubber dam isolation, tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO, 17% EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, then take the sample again, drying the canal and fill the canal with a commercial calcium hydroxide-based paste. After 2 weeks, the canals were filled with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Control group2.5%NaClORubber dam isolation, tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO, 17% EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, then take the sample again, drying the canal and fill the canal with a commercial calcium hydroxide-based paste. After 2 weeks, the canals were filled with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Experimental grouproot canal obturationRubber dam isolation,tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO for 1 min, then 17%EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, drying the canal, aPDT, then take the sample again. then dried the canals and filled the canals with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Experimental groupaPDTRubber dam isolation,tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO for 1 min, then 17%EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, drying the canal, aPDT, then take the sample again. then dried the canals and filled the canals with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Experimental grouproot canal preparationRubber dam isolation,tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO for 1 min, then 17%EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, drying the canal, aPDT, then take the sample again. then dried the canals and filled the canals with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Control grouproot canal obturationRubber dam isolation, tooth disinfection,acess to the pulp of the chamber, microbiological sample with two sterile paper points, then mechanical preparation with NITIMTWO to 25#06, and cleaned with 5 ml of 2.5% NaClO between each endodontic file. At the end of the procedure, root canals were ultrasonic irrigated with 2.5% NaClO, 17% EDTA for 1 min followed by irrigation with 0.9% normal saline to remove the smear layer, then take the sample again, drying the canal and fill the canal with a commercial calcium hydroxide-based paste. After 2 weeks, the canals were filled with AH-Plus sealer and Gutta-percha by vertical condensation. The teeth were take crown restoration. Follow up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quantification of bacteria by colony counting2 days after the sample taken

Quantification the total bacteria

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
tooth pain1 week and 3, 6, 12, 24 months after treatment

patient subjected sensation and doctor remark the symptoms after clinical examination

change of the lesion3, 6, 12, 24 months after treatment

take X ray, measure the lesion and compare to post-treatment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

School and Hospital of stomatology,Fujian Medical University

🇨🇳

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath