Evaluation of Metal-on-conventional-polyethylene vs Ceramic-on-ceramic Articulating Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty Complications
- Interventions
- Device: Ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented hip arthroplastyDevice: Metal-on-polyethylene uncemented total hip arthroplasty
- Registration Number
- NCT03692364
- Lead Sponsor
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
- Brief Summary
Polyethylene wear debris from metal-on-polyethylene articulations are one of the main causes of periprosthetic bone loss and non-infectious loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Ceramic articulations have a very low wear rate when measured in the laboratory and the investigator's hypothesis is that hip arthroplasty with an all ceramic articulation will have less osteolysis and wear in addition to equally good fixation and clinical outcome compared to the same hip arthroplasty design with a metal-on-polyethylene joint.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 104
- primary osteoarthritis
- secondary osteoarthritis caused by idiopathic osteonecrosis, dysplasia or childhood disease (Mb Perthes, epiphysiolysis)
- inflammatory arthritis
- hip joint infection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ceramic-on-ceramic Ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented hip arthroplasty Uncemented hip arthroplasty (ABG-2, Stryker, Mahwah NJ, US) with a prosthetic femoral head and an acetabular liner made of alumina ceramic (Biolox Forte, Ceramtec, Plochingen, Germany). Metal-on-conventional polyethylene Metal-on-polyethylene uncemented total hip arthroplasty Uncemented hip arthroplasty (ABG-2, Stryker, Mahwah NJ, US) with a CoCr prosthetic femoral head and an acetabular liner made of intermedially cross-linked polyethylene polyethylene (Duration, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, US).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Osteolysis frequency change between 7 and 15 years Change between 7 to 15 years after surgery Osteolysis frequency (%) measured with computed tomography,
Osteolysis size change between 7 and 15 years Change between 7 and 15 years after surgery Osteolysis size (cm3) measured with computed tomography
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical function at 7 years 7 years after surgery Harris Hip Score (0-100)
Articulation wear at 7 years At 7 years after surgery Articulation wear as measured with radiostereometry, mm/year
Articulation wear at 15 years 15 years after surgery Articulation wear as measured with radiostereometry, mm/year
Implant fixation at 7 years 7 years after surgery Stem and cup translation (mm/year) and rotation (degrees/year) measured with radiostereometry
Implant fixation at 15 years At 15 years after surgery Stem and cup translation (mm/year) and rotation (degrees/year) measured with radiostereometry
Clinical function at 15 years 15 years after surgery Harris Hip Score (0-100)