MedPath

Evaluation of Metal-on-conventional-polyethylene vs Ceramic-on-ceramic Articulating Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Not Applicable
Conditions
Arthroplasty Complications
Interventions
Device: Ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented hip arthroplasty
Device: Metal-on-polyethylene uncemented total hip arthroplasty
Registration Number
NCT03692364
Lead Sponsor
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
Brief Summary

Polyethylene wear debris from metal-on-polyethylene articulations are one of the main causes of periprosthetic bone loss and non-infectious loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Ceramic articulations have a very low wear rate when measured in the laboratory and the investigator's hypothesis is that hip arthroplasty with an all ceramic articulation will have less osteolysis and wear in addition to equally good fixation and clinical outcome compared to the same hip arthroplasty design with a metal-on-polyethylene joint.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
104
Inclusion Criteria
  • primary osteoarthritis
  • secondary osteoarthritis caused by idiopathic osteonecrosis, dysplasia or childhood disease (Mb Perthes, epiphysiolysis)
Exclusion Criteria
  • inflammatory arthritis
  • hip joint infection

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Ceramic-on-ceramicCeramic-on-ceramic uncemented hip arthroplastyUncemented hip arthroplasty (ABG-2, Stryker, Mahwah NJ, US) with a prosthetic femoral head and an acetabular liner made of alumina ceramic (Biolox Forte, Ceramtec, Plochingen, Germany).
Metal-on-conventional polyethyleneMetal-on-polyethylene uncemented total hip arthroplastyUncemented hip arthroplasty (ABG-2, Stryker, Mahwah NJ, US) with a CoCr prosthetic femoral head and an acetabular liner made of intermedially cross-linked polyethylene polyethylene (Duration, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, US).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Osteolysis frequency change between 7 and 15 yearsChange between 7 to 15 years after surgery

Osteolysis frequency (%) measured with computed tomography,

Osteolysis size change between 7 and 15 yearsChange between 7 and 15 years after surgery

Osteolysis size (cm3) measured with computed tomography

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical function at 7 years7 years after surgery

Harris Hip Score (0-100)

Articulation wear at 7 yearsAt 7 years after surgery

Articulation wear as measured with radiostereometry, mm/year

Articulation wear at 15 years15 years after surgery

Articulation wear as measured with radiostereometry, mm/year

Implant fixation at 7 years7 years after surgery

Stem and cup translation (mm/year) and rotation (degrees/year) measured with radiostereometry

Implant fixation at 15 yearsAt 15 years after surgery

Stem and cup translation (mm/year) and rotation (degrees/year) measured with radiostereometry

Clinical function at 15 years15 years after surgery

Harris Hip Score (0-100)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath