MedPath

Evaluating Contact Lens Optics

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Myopia
Interventions
Device: Single vision contact lens
Device: Multifocal contact lens
Registration Number
NCT05028790
Lead Sponsor
David A Berntsen, OD PhD
Brief Summary

This study will evaluate changes in refractive error and visual performance between a single vision soft contact lens and multifocal soft contact lens

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
16
Inclusion Criteria
  • Able to read and understand the informed consent document
  • 18 to 39 years of age (inclusive)
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the right eye
  • Refractive error from -1.00D to -6.00D with astigmatism less than or equal to -1.00D in the right eye (corneal plane)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any ocular or systemic conditions affecting vision, refraction, or the ability to wear a soft contact lens
  • History of ocular trauma or surgery causing abnormal or distorted vision
  • Current Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) contact lens wearers
  • Unwilling to have contact lens fit photographed
  • Pregnant and/or lactating females, by self-report

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Single vision soft contact lens first, then multifocal soft contact lensSingle vision contact lensParticipants wore the single vision soft contact lens first, then a multifocal soft contact lens
Multifocal soft contact lens first, then single vision soft contact lensSingle vision contact lensParticipants wore the multifocal soft contact lens first, then the single vision soft contact lens
Multifocal soft contact lens first, then single vision soft contact lensMultifocal contact lensParticipants wore the multifocal soft contact lens first, then the single vision soft contact lens
Single vision soft contact lens first, then multifocal soft contact lensMultifocal contact lensParticipants wore the single vision soft contact lens first, then a multifocal soft contact lens
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual PerformanceThrough completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours

Low contrast visual acuity was measured for each participant while wearing each of the two lenses

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error On-axisThrough completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours

Refraction was measured after cycloplegia with two drops of 1% tropicamide hydrochloride. Spherical equivalent refractive error was then measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.

Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 30 Degrees Temporal RetinaThrough completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours

Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.

Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 30 Degrees Nasal RetinaThrough completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours

Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.

Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 20 Degrees Temporal RetinaThrough completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours

Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.

Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 20 Degrees Nasal RetinaThrough completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours

Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath