Evaluating Contact Lens Optics
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Interventions
- Device: Single vision contact lensDevice: Multifocal contact lens
- Registration Number
- NCT05028790
- Lead Sponsor
- David A Berntsen, OD PhD
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate changes in refractive error and visual performance between a single vision soft contact lens and multifocal soft contact lens
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 16
- Able to read and understand the informed consent document
- 18 to 39 years of age (inclusive)
- Best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the right eye
- Refractive error from -1.00D to -6.00D with astigmatism less than or equal to -1.00D in the right eye (corneal plane)
- Any ocular or systemic conditions affecting vision, refraction, or the ability to wear a soft contact lens
- History of ocular trauma or surgery causing abnormal or distorted vision
- Current Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) contact lens wearers
- Unwilling to have contact lens fit photographed
- Pregnant and/or lactating females, by self-report
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Single vision soft contact lens first, then multifocal soft contact lens Single vision contact lens Participants wore the single vision soft contact lens first, then a multifocal soft contact lens Multifocal soft contact lens first, then single vision soft contact lens Single vision contact lens Participants wore the multifocal soft contact lens first, then the single vision soft contact lens Multifocal soft contact lens first, then single vision soft contact lens Multifocal contact lens Participants wore the multifocal soft contact lens first, then the single vision soft contact lens Single vision soft contact lens first, then multifocal soft contact lens Multifocal contact lens Participants wore the single vision soft contact lens first, then a multifocal soft contact lens
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Performance Through completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours Low contrast visual acuity was measured for each participant while wearing each of the two lenses
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error On-axis Through completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours Refraction was measured after cycloplegia with two drops of 1% tropicamide hydrochloride. Spherical equivalent refractive error was then measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.
Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 30 Degrees Temporal Retina Through completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.
Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 30 Degrees Nasal Retina Through completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.
Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 20 Degrees Temporal Retina Through completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.
Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 20 Degrees Nasal Retina Through completion of study visit, an average of 2.5 hours Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was measured 3 times with an aberrometer and averaged.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States