Effect of Scapular Mobilization with Movement (MWM) on shoulder dysfunction in adhesive capsulitis- A randomized controlled trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 70
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Scapular Kinematics which includes assessing Scapulohumeral rhythm using inclinometer, clavicular elevation using inclinometer and scapular balance test assessed using vernier calliper
Study Overview
Brief Summary
MWM is associated with improvement in pain, range of motion, and function in patients with a range of shoulder musculoskeletal disorders and the effects are clinically significant. Scapular involvement in shoulder function is essential. Most arm functions involve scapular movement. Abnormal scapular movement has been associated with shoulder instability and shoulder impingement syndrome. There is substantial evidence indicating scapular kinematic abnormalities in individuals with shoulder pain. Research has shown that mobility deficits of FS affected not only the glenohumeral but also the scapulothoracic articulation. However, manual therapy techniques have primarily focused on mobilizing the glenohumeral joint in patients with frozen shoulder. Mobilization with movement is a specific form of manual therapy that is gaining increasing popularity, with several studies showing its benefit for a range of shoulder conditions. MWM involves applying a sustained gliding force (the passive mobilization component) while the patient concurrently performs an active movement , the active movement component. When MWM is precisely indicated, it has been shown to improve painful movement and immediately enhance function. As such, MWM differs from passive manual therapy, which is based on a test treat retest approach. There are very few studies examining the effectiveness of scapular mobilization in relation to shoulder joint pain, disability, and range of motion, and these studies have primarily involved passive mobilization. We hypothesize that scapular MWM given over a period of 4 weeks along with glenohumeral MWM would result in improvement in range of motion , reduce pain and improve scapular kinematics by improving motor control strategy employed by the central nervous system when the glide is successfully applied.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Masking
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 35.00 Year(s) to 50.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adhesive Capsulitis at stage 1 or 2 with duration of symptoms less than 3 months, pain with active and passive shoulder ROM and limitation of flexion, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation at least 25 percent reduction in shoulder external rotation compared to unaffected side.
- •Pain on a VAS scale of at least 4 but less than
- •Patient willing to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- •Any restriction in shoulder range of motion due to trauma resulting in humerus fracture and dislocation or surgery Shoulder restriction due to cerebrovascular accident or any other neurological condition.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Scapular Kinematics which includes assessing Scapulohumeral rhythm using inclinometer, clavicular elevation using inclinometer and scapular balance test assessed using vernier calliper
Time Frame: Scapular Kinematics will be assessed at baseline and at the end of 4th week | Shoulder Pain and Disability Index will be assessed at baseline and at the end of 4th week
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index or SPADI
Time Frame: Scapular Kinematics will be assessed at baseline and at the end of 4th week | Shoulder Pain and Disability Index will be assessed at baseline and at the end of 4th week
Secondary Outcomes
- pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)(Range of motion (ROM) using standard universal goniometer)
Investigators
Roopa Rao
Krishna College of Physiotherapy
