MedPath

Assessment of Effectiveness of Belatacept Patient Alert Card in Patients Following Renal Transplantation in a Sample of EU Countries

Completed
Conditions
Renal Transplant
Registration Number
NCT02581644
Lead Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine a) if the implementation of belatacept patient alert card (PAC) resulted in effective understanding of key safety messages and b) if the degree of understanding of key safety messages is associated with improved clinical and safety outcomes.

Detailed Description

3 sub studies: 2 Cross-Sectional and 1 retrospective chart review

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
63
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient survey (cohort 1):
  • Patients has taken belatacept within the previous 3 months for renal transplantation
  • Patient is over 18 years of age
  • HCP survey (cohort 2):
  • Physician or nurses working in nephrology centers, with at least 1 patient taking belatacept in the previous 6 months for renal transplantation (by prescribing, administering or by follow up)
  • Retrospective chart review study (cohort 3):
  • Patient survey questionnaire received, Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed (if required)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient survey:
  • Patient has participated in a clinical trial for their renal condition in the previous 12 months
  • Currently an employee of BMS
  • HCP survey:
  • Physicians or nurse who have recruited patients for the Patient survey
  • Currently an employee of BMS
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
HCP survey: Behavior of HCPs based on responses to behavioral questionsDay 1
HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its useDay 1
Patient survey: Proportion of patients with correct responses to behavioral questionsAt patient enrolment
HCP survey: Levels of HCPs' knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of infections and the need to screen for specific infection prior to initiating or administering belataceptDay 1

The percentage of HCPs with responses to each question in the HCP questionnaire that would indicate effectiveness of the PAC will be determined: who are aware of the PAC, use the PAC, level of knowledge and comprehension of the risks and mean scores for correct responses

HCP survey: Mean total score for correct responsesDay 1
Patient survey: Proportion of patients treated with belatacept who are aware of the existence of the PACAt patient enrolment
HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who prescribe or administer belatacept in nephrology centres who are aware of the PACDay 1
Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study): Proportion of serious infectionsUpto 4 years
Patient survey : Proportion of patients treated with belatacept who have received the PACAt patient enrolment
Patient survey : Proportion of patients who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its useAt patient enrolment
Patient survey: Levels of patient knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of belatacept treatmentAt patient enrolment
Patient survey: HCP-patient communication based on responses to specific questionsAt patient enrolment
Patient survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectivesAt patient enrolment

Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge

HCP survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectivesDay 1

Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major determinants of patients knowledge of the key messages contained in the belatacept PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaireAt patient enrolment

Determinants: Age, gender, educational level, number of prescription medications, duration of therapy with belatacept

Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : mean time from symptom onset of infection to receipt of medical therapyUpto 4 years
Major determinants of understanding the key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaireAt patient enrolment

Determinants: Age, gender, educational level, number of prescription medications, duration of therapy with belatacept

Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : proportion of infections leading to discontinuationUpto 4 years
Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : Mean time to diagnosis of graft rejection by biopsy criteriaUpto 4 years
Determinants of Health Care Professional (HCP) understanding and implementation regarding key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaireDay 1

Determinants: type of HCP, country, age and gender of HCP years in specialty, number of HCPs in the unit, annual number of patients through the unit, number of patients for whom belatacept was prescribed in the previous 12 months, type of practice, type of institution (academic or non-academic), size of town

Major determinants of implementation regarding the key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaireAt patient enrolment

Determinants: Age, gender, educational level, number of prescription medications, duration of therapy with belatacept

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

CHU Clemont Ferrand

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

APHP Hopital Henri Mondor

🇫🇷

Créteil, France

Local Institution

🇸🇪

Uppsala, Sweden

CHU Bordeaux Hopital Pellegrin

🇫🇷

Burdeux, France

CHU Brest Hopital La Cavale Blanche

🇫🇷

Brest, France

CHU Tours Hopital Bretonneau

🇫🇷

Tours, France

CHU Toulouse Hopital Rangueli

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

UK Mannheim

🇩🇪

Mannheim, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath