Assessment of Effectiveness of Belatacept Patient Alert Card in Patients Following Renal Transplantation in a Sample of EU Countries
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Registration Number
- NCT02581644
- Lead Sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine a) if the implementation of belatacept patient alert card (PAC) resulted in effective understanding of key safety messages and b) if the degree of understanding of key safety messages is associated with improved clinical and safety outcomes.
- Detailed Description
3 sub studies: 2 Cross-Sectional and 1 retrospective chart review
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 63
- Patient survey (cohort 1):
- Patients has taken belatacept within the previous 3 months for renal transplantation
- Patient is over 18 years of age
- HCP survey (cohort 2):
- Physician or nurses working in nephrology centers, with at least 1 patient taking belatacept in the previous 6 months for renal transplantation (by prescribing, administering or by follow up)
- Retrospective chart review study (cohort 3):
- Patient survey questionnaire received, Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed (if required)
- Patient survey:
- Patient has participated in a clinical trial for their renal condition in the previous 12 months
- Currently an employee of BMS
- HCP survey:
- Physicians or nurse who have recruited patients for the Patient survey
- Currently an employee of BMS
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HCP survey: Behavior of HCPs based on responses to behavioral questions Day 1 HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its use Day 1 Patient survey: Proportion of patients with correct responses to behavioral questions At patient enrolment HCP survey: Levels of HCPs' knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of infections and the need to screen for specific infection prior to initiating or administering belatacept Day 1 The percentage of HCPs with responses to each question in the HCP questionnaire that would indicate effectiveness of the PAC will be determined: who are aware of the PAC, use the PAC, level of knowledge and comprehension of the risks and mean scores for correct responses
HCP survey: Mean total score for correct responses Day 1 Patient survey: Proportion of patients treated with belatacept who are aware of the existence of the PAC At patient enrolment HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who prescribe or administer belatacept in nephrology centres who are aware of the PAC Day 1 Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study): Proportion of serious infections Upto 4 years Patient survey : Proportion of patients treated with belatacept who have received the PAC At patient enrolment Patient survey : Proportion of patients who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its use At patient enrolment Patient survey: Levels of patient knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of belatacept treatment At patient enrolment Patient survey: HCP-patient communication based on responses to specific questions At patient enrolment Patient survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectives At patient enrolment Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge
HCP survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectives Day 1 Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Major determinants of patients knowledge of the key messages contained in the belatacept PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire At patient enrolment Determinants: Age, gender, educational level, number of prescription medications, duration of therapy with belatacept
Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : mean time from symptom onset of infection to receipt of medical therapy Upto 4 years Major determinants of understanding the key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire At patient enrolment Determinants: Age, gender, educational level, number of prescription medications, duration of therapy with belatacept
Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : proportion of infections leading to discontinuation Upto 4 years Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study) : Mean time to diagnosis of graft rejection by biopsy criteria Upto 4 years Determinants of Health Care Professional (HCP) understanding and implementation regarding key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire Day 1 Determinants: type of HCP, country, age and gender of HCP years in specialty, number of HCPs in the unit, annual number of patients through the unit, number of patients for whom belatacept was prescribed in the previous 12 months, type of practice, type of institution (academic or non-academic), size of town
Major determinants of implementation regarding the key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the patient questionnaire At patient enrolment Determinants: Age, gender, educational level, number of prescription medications, duration of therapy with belatacept
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
CHU Clemont Ferrand
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France
APHP Hopital Henri Mondor
🇫🇷Créteil, France
Local Institution
🇸🇪Uppsala, Sweden
CHU Bordeaux Hopital Pellegrin
🇫🇷Burdeux, France
CHU Brest Hopital La Cavale Blanche
🇫🇷Brest, France
CHU Tours Hopital Bretonneau
🇫🇷Tours, France
CHU Toulouse Hopital Rangueli
🇫🇷Toulouse, France
UK Mannheim
🇩🇪Mannheim, Germany