Use of a Freeze-dried Amniotic Membrane Post Crosslinking in Subjects With Progressive Keratoconus
- Conditions
- Progressive Keratoconus
- Interventions
- Combination Product: Therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (Visio-AMTRIX)Device: Therapeutic lens alone
- Registration Number
- NCT06450470
- Lead Sponsor
- TBF Genie Tissulaire
- Brief Summary
Crosslinking is a therapeutic technique used to increase the rigidity of the cornea in order to slow or stop progression of keratoconus. The main complication of the treatment of keratoconus by crosslinking is postoperative pain due to the removal of the corneal epithelium. Currently, the management of pain is done through the administration of artificial tears and paracetamol. The amniotic membrane is a biological tissue used in ophthalmology to treat injuries of the surface of the eye. It has healing and analgesic properties.
The objective of this multicenter randomized study is to evaluate the benefit of placing an amniotic membrane on the eye post-crosslinking to reduce pain and promote corneal healing.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 116
- Man or woman between 18 and 65 years old.
- Indication for accelerated conventional crosslinking.
- Patient with progressive keratoconus (increase in Kmax of ≥ 0.5 diopters in 3 to 6 months or ≥ 1 diopter in 3 to 12 months with loss of 10 microns on minimum pachymetry in 3 to 12 month).
- Patient suffering from keratoconus with a compatible topographic form (Kmax ≥ 47.0 diopters (D) and difference inferior-superior of 1.5 D).
- Patient with a minimum corneal thickness greater than 400 microns.
- Informed and consenting patient.
- Patient physically and mentally capable of completing the post-operative pain assessment self-questionnaire.
- Patient having signed the informed consent of the French Ophthalmology Society for crosslinking.
- Patient affiliated to a social security system or beneficiary of such a system.
- Woman without effective means of contraception, pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patient who has already benefited from a crosslinking procedure on one of the eyes.
- Patient with a history of refractive surgery on one of the eyes.
- Patient with an intracorneal ring segment on one of the eyes.
- Patient suffering from a serious systemic pathology (autoimmune and/or immunodepressive)
- Patient with a psychiatric pathology.
- Patient on long-term analgesics and/or corticosteroids.
- Indication of crosslinking outside the classic protocol.
- Patient with central corneal opacity.
- Patient suffering from a severe dry eye syndrome or a neurotrophic keratitis.
- Patient with a history of ocular herpes.
- Patient with a history of ocular varicella-zoster virus infection.
- Patient with glaucoma.
- Patient treated with topical cyclosporine in the last 6 months.
- Patient deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.
- Patient subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (Visio-AMTRIX) Therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (Visio-AMTRIX) - Therapeutic lens alone Therapeutic lens alone -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in analgesic consumption between patients treated with a therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and patients treated with a therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Day 0, Day 1, Day 2 Amount in grams of analgesic consumed per day
Difference between the level of ocular pain experienced by patients treated with therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and by patients treated with therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Day 0 bedtime, Day 1 wake-up, Day 1 bedtime, Day 2 wake-up, Day 2 consultation Pain evaluated from 0: no pain to 10: worst imaginable pain on visual analog scale (VAS)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in visual acuity between eyes treated with therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and eyes treated with therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Week 6 Determination of logMAR values of best corrected visual acuity
Difference in topographic parameters (Kmax, inferior-superior) between eyes treated with therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and eyes treated with therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Week 6 Topographic parameters (Kmax, inferior-superior) evaluated by corneal topography
Difference in dryness between eyes treated with therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and eyes treated with therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Week 6 Dry eye and effect on vision evaluated between 0 (no disability) and 100 (greater disability) using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Difference in corneal cicatrisation between eyes treated with therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and eyes treated with therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Day 2, (Day 7), Week 6 Healing evaluated under slit lamp by fluorescein examination
Difference in corneal thickness between eyes treated with therapeutic lens + amniotic membrane (experimental) and eyes treated with therapeutic lens alone (active comparator) Week 6 Corneal thickness evaluated by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Hospices Civils de Lyon
🇫🇷Lyon, France
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
🇫🇷Marseille, France
CHU de Montpellier
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
CHU de Toulouse
🇫🇷Toulouse, France
CHU de Brest
🇫🇷Brest, France
CHU de Nantes
🇫🇷Nantes, France
Hôpital National de la Vision des Quinze-Vingts
🇫🇷Paris, France
CHU de Saint-Etienne
🇫🇷Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
🇫🇷Strasbourg, France