Intervention on Modifiable Lifestyle Risk Factors for Dementia Prevention

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Risk Behavior; Cognitive Decline
• Interventions: Behavioral: Diet Group; Behavioral: Cognitive Engagement Group; Behavioral: Physical Activity Group; Behavioral: Multimodal group

• Registration Number: NCT04616794
• Lead Sponsor: LuciLab

Brief Summary

The overarching aim is to develop and deploy a multidomain intervention delivered on a mobile application to help older adults reduce their risk for dementia by improving a set of modifiable lifestyle risk factors associated with cognitive decline/dementia. The targeted domains are physical activity, diet, and cognitively stimulating activity. This registration concerns the Proof-of-concept study which will examine if individual parts of the intervention program achieve a clinically significant degree of change in the targeted behavioral risk outcomes. It is expected that following the program, at least 50% of participants will show evidence of a clinically significant degree of change in the behavioral risk outcome targeted by the intervention, when compared to baseline.

Detailed Description

There are encouraging indications from observational and prospective studies that late life multidomain lifestyle interventions can reduce the risk of cognitive decline and dementia, as well as improve cognition. However, these studies raise major issues related to scalability and adherence which can be addressed by relying on technology. These studies mainly used intensive and costly face-to-face interventions that are not easily implemented on a large scale. Furthermore, there are challenges with the adherence to all the components of a multi-domain lifestyle program.

Technology-delivered interventions have the potential to overcome some of the limitations of traditional face-to-face interventions. They confer numerous advantages including scalability of use in a real-world setting while limiting geographical constraints and other logistical challenges such as clinic attendance requirements. Such delivery modes also offer user convenience (e.g., undertaken at home and flexible schedule) and reduced costs associated with large-scale deployment of studies and programs.

In addition to the inclusion of technology, the success of health promotion interventions may also be improved by integrating models of lifestyle habit patterns and behaviour change determinants. The coach-based intervention will integrate behavioural change techniques based on the Behaviour Change Wheel developed by Michie. The coach intervention approach will also be guided by the Transtheoretical model of behaviour change principles proposed by Prochaska and DiClemente, and Motivational Interviewing techniques described by Rollnick and Miller.

The Proof-of-Concept study is a 10-week pre-post within-subject parallel group treatment-only study. There will be three single-domain groups (diet; physical activity or cognitive engagement), and one multidomain group. Participants will receive up to 9 weekly coach-assisted counselling sessions. The goal is to recruit up to 55 participants with at least one of the target risk factors : unhealthy diet, low level of cognitively stimulating activity or physical activity). Participants with a single risk factor will be invited to the single-domain condition for which they have a risk. Participants with multiple risk factors will be invited to the multidomain condition. The risk level for each domain will be examined before and after the intervention to assess whether the intervention has induced a clinically significant change.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-10-13
• Study First Submitted: 2020-10-13
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-10-29
• Study First Posted: 2020-11-05
• Primary Completion: 2020-12-24
• Study Completion: 2021-01-15
• Status Verified: 2021-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-10-31
• Last Update Posted: 2022-11-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 41

Inclusion Criteria

• Proficient or native speakers in French;

• Computer literate;

• Committed not to participate in another program related to any of the three intervention domains for the duration of the trial;

• At least one of the following:

  • Low cognitive engagement in cognitively stimulating activities, defined as a score ≤ 15 on the CAQ
  • Low level of physical activity defined as less than 600 MET-min/week (~150 minutes/week) of MVPA measured using the IPAQ-SF
  • Low adherence to the Mediterranean-type diet defined as a score of ≤ 8 on the adapted Canadian MDS

Exclusion Criteria

• Presence of a cognitive impairment as measured by the Cogstate Brief BatteryTM ;

• General anesthesia within the last 6 months;

• Participation in any previous validation studies related to the program;

• Participation, currently or within the last 6 months, in a program where they received any of the three interventions;

• Unable to commit participation over the period of the study.

• Participants in the precontemplation stage of change.

• Participants with a high level of perceived stress.

• Having received a diagnosis of:

  • Dementia or neurodegenerative disease;
  • Past or present neurological disorder;
  • Severe psychiatric disorder;
  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic diseases;
  • Alcoholism or drug addiction;
  • Any other conditions expected to limit participation.

Domain-Specific exclusion criteria

• Participants will be excluded from the physical activity intervention, but not the trial, if they have a medical contraindication to physical activity based on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
• Individuals with dietary restrictions due to medical reasons, allergies or severe intolerance or an history of eating disorders will be excluded from participation in the healthy diet intervention.

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Diet Group	Diet Group	Participants eligible to enter this group must have a low adherence to the Mediterranean-type diet defined as a score of ≤ 8 on the adapted Canadian Mediterranean Diet Scale (MDS).
Cognitive Engagement Group	Cognitive Engagement Group	Participants eligible to enter this group must show low cognitive engagement in cognitively stimulating activities, defined as a score \< 22 on the Cognitive Activity Questionnaire (CAQ)
Physical Activity Group	Physical Activity Group	Participants eligible to enter this group must have a low level of physical activity defined as less than 600 MET-min/week (\~150 minutes/week) of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAQ-SF)
Multi-modal Group	Multimodal group	Participants eligible to enter this group must be eligible for at least two of the three single-arm conditions.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change from Baseline in Mediterranean Diet Adherence at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet is measured with an adaptation of the Canadian Mediterranean Diet Scale (MDS). The scale consists of 13 questions on food consumption frequency and intake habits. Scores range from 0 to 13, where a higher score represents a higher adherence level.
Change from Baseline in Cognitive Engagement at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Cognitive engagement is measured using the Cognitive Activity Questionnaire (CAQ). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency in which they engage in 10 cognitive leisure activities. Scores range from 0 to 70. A higher score represents a higher cognitive engagement level.
Change from Baseline in Physical Activity at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Physical activity level is measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF). The IPAQ-SF consists of 7 items to assess Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) as well as walking and sitting time in the last 7 days. An overall total physical activity score is computed in Metabolic equivalent tasks (MET)-minutes/week, where a higher MET value represents a higher level of physical activity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Perceived Progress in adopting lifestyle changes	Study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Perceived Progress in adopting lifestyle changes will be investigated with a single question, "To what extent do you think you changed your (domain specified) lifestyle since the beginning of the program?", using a 10-point Likert-like scale, where 10 represents a major change.
Change from Baseline in Luci Physical Activity Score at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Three questions assess frequency and intensity of specific physical activities related to aerobic, resistance and flexibility training over the past 7 days. Three subscores and a total score ranging from 0-30 are computed, where higher scores represent higher physical activity levels.
Program Quality	Study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	The quality of the program is assessed using the end-user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS). The uMARS is a 20-item questionnaire that includes 4 objective quality subscales (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality), and 1 subjective quality subscale. A summary score is calculated as the mean score across the 4 objective criteria. One further subscale, consisting of 6 items, measures users' perceived impact of the evaluated app. Score range from 0-5, where 5 represents a higher quality and impact, respectively.
Change from Baseline in Luci Mediterranean Diet Adherence Score at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Eight questions are added to the Canadian Mediterranean Diet questionnaire to include food groups and food intake habits not covered in the original questionnaire. From the whole questionnaire, a total score is computed ranging from 0 to 36, where a higher score represents a higher adherence level.
Change from Baseline in Luci Cognitive Engagement Score at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Six questions are added to the Cognitive Activity Questionnaire to include stimulating cognitive activities not covered in the original questionnaire. From the whole questionnaire, a total score is computed ranging from 0 to 112, where a higher score represents a higher cognitive engagement level.
Goal Attainment	Weekly (within 1 week after the first coaching session) up to study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	For each goal, level of attainment and perceived effort towards goal attainment are rated weekly using a 10-point Likert-like scale, where 10 represents "completed" and "maximal effort", respectively.
Change from Baseline in Readiness to change at study end	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) and study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Readiness to change will be determined using a 6-item questionnaire at Baseline and a 3-item questionnaire at study end.
Program Usability	Study end (± 1 week after the last coaching session)	The usability of the program is assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a 10-item questionnaire. Scores range from 0-5, where a higher score represents a higher usability.
Satisfaction and Continuance Usage Intention	Study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	The user's continuance intention is assessed using the Satisfaction and Continuance Usage Intention Questionnaire. The questionnaire comprises 28 questions assessing 9 constructs, (Continuance intention, Expectation confirmation, Satisfaction, Perceived usefulness, Perceived ease of use, Trust/Credibility, Perceived security and confidentiality, Perceived service quality, Perceived system quality). Score range from 0-5, where a higher score represent a higher agreement, respectively.
Platform usage	Baseline (within 1 week before the first coaching session) to study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Continuous measures of different parameters linked to platform usage during the study period will be recorded and analyzed, including pattern of use (e.g., time of day), frequency (e.g., number of platform access), duration of use (e.g., duration of the coach sessions) and the functionalities used (e.g., content viewed).
Overall User Experience	Study end (within 1 week after the last coaching session)	Feedback about the overall user experience with the platform will be collected using a semi-structured interview conducted by phone.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sylvie Belleville; 🇨🇦 Montréal, Quebec, Canada