A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses
- Conditions
- Presbyopia
- Interventions
- Device: comfilcon A Extended Range test lensDevice: comfilcon A control lens
- Registration Number
- NCT02719353
- Lead Sponsor
- Coopervision, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to validate the clinical of comfilcon A extended range high add center near (CN) multifocal lenses in existing contact lens wearers against the current comfilcon A high add multifocal lenses.
- Detailed Description
This study is a 13-subject, randomized, prospective, single site, daily wear, single-masked (to the subject), bilateral, 4-day cross-over, dispensing study comparing the comfilcon A extended range multifocal test lens against the comfilcon A multifocal control lens.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
- Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years
- Is 50 years of age or greater and has full legal capacity to volunteer
- Is able to read and understand the informed consent
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule
- Has a spherical distance contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -5.00D (Diopters) (inclusive)
- Near Add Power requirement of +2.25D or greater
- Has spectacle cylinder 0.75 D in both eyes
- Has normal binocularity (no amblyopia, no strabismus, no habitually uncorrected anisometropia ≥ 2.00D)
- Has monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has not worn gas permeable contact lenses for 1 month prior to the study
A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has never worn contact lenses before
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health
- Has any ocular pathology or abnormality that would affect the wearing of contact lenses
- Is aphakic (i.e. missing their natural lens inside their eye)
- Has uncorrected anisometropia (i.e. difference in the prescription between the eyes) of ≥2.00 D
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description comfilcon A Extended Range test lens comfilcon A control lens Subjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair. comfilcon A control lens comfilcon A Extended Range test lens Subjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair. comfilcon A control lens comfilcon A control lens Subjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair. comfilcon A Extended Range test lens comfilcon A Extended Range test lens Subjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Acuity 4 days Visual acuity was measured at distance, intermediate and near conditions for test and control lens was assessed by LogMAR.
Visual Performance 4 days Subjective assessment of visual performance for test and control lens is assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time and cannot function, 100= excellent vision all of the time).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lens Fit 4 days Lens fit acceptance (general fit characteristics) is assessed for test and control lens on a 0-4 grading system in 0.25 steps where 0 represented very poor fit.
Bulbar Hyperemia 4 days Bulbar hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.
Subjective Satisfaction 4 days Subjective satisfaction for test and control lens was assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=very satisfied)
Subjective Ratings for Comfort 4 days Subjective ratings for comfort was assessed for test and control lens on a Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).
Subjective Ratings for Dryness 4 days Subjective ratings for dryness was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).
Lens Handling 4 Days Subjective ratings for handling (ease of insertion and removal) was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=very difficult to handle, 100=easy to handle).
Average Daily Wearing Time 4 days Average daily wearing time for test and control lens is assessed in hours.
Limbal Hyperemia 4 days Limbal hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.
Subjective Preference for Near Vision 4 days Subjective preference for near vision for test and control contact lenses. comfort, vision, handling, satisfaction.
Subjective Preference for Intermediate Vision 4 days Subjective preference for intermediate vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Overall Vision 4 days Subjective preference for overall vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Comfort 4 days Subjective preference for comfort for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Preference for Distance Vision 4 days Subjective preference for distance vision for test and control contact lenses.
Subjective Overall Lens Preference 4 days Subjective overall lens preference for test and control contact lenses.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CORL, Indiana University
🇺🇸Bloomington, Indiana, United States