MedPath

A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Presbyopia
Interventions
Device: comfilcon A Extended Range test lens
Device: comfilcon A control lens
Registration Number
NCT02719353
Lead Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to validate the clinical of comfilcon A extended range high add center near (CN) multifocal lenses in existing contact lens wearers against the current comfilcon A high add multifocal lenses.

Detailed Description

This study is a 13-subject, randomized, prospective, single site, daily wear, single-masked (to the subject), bilateral, 4-day cross-over, dispensing study comparing the comfilcon A extended range multifocal test lens against the comfilcon A multifocal control lens.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
14
Inclusion Criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:

  • Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years
  • Is 50 years of age or greater and has full legal capacity to volunteer
  • Is able to read and understand the informed consent
  • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule
  • Has a spherical distance contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -5.00D (Diopters) (inclusive)
  • Near Add Power requirement of +2.25D or greater
  • Has spectacle cylinder 0.75 D in both eyes
  • Has normal binocularity (no amblyopia, no strabismus, no habitually uncorrected anisometropia ≥ 2.00D)
  • Has monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has not worn gas permeable contact lenses for 1 month prior to the study
Exclusion Criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:

  • Has never worn contact lenses before
  • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health
  • Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health
  • Has any ocular pathology or abnormality that would affect the wearing of contact lenses
  • Is aphakic (i.e. missing their natural lens inside their eye)
  • Has uncorrected anisometropia (i.e. difference in the prescription between the eyes) of ≥2.00 D
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
comfilcon A Extended Range test lenscomfilcon A control lensSubjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair.
comfilcon A control lenscomfilcon A Extended Range test lensSubjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair.
comfilcon A control lenscomfilcon A control lensSubjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair.
comfilcon A Extended Range test lenscomfilcon A Extended Range test lensSubjects will be randomized to wear either the test or control pair of lens, then cross over to the alternate pair.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Acuity4 days

Visual acuity was measured at distance, intermediate and near conditions for test and control lens was assessed by LogMAR.

Visual Performance4 days

Subjective assessment of visual performance for test and control lens is assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time and cannot function, 100= excellent vision all of the time).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lens Fit4 days

Lens fit acceptance (general fit characteristics) is assessed for test and control lens on a 0-4 grading system in 0.25 steps where 0 represented very poor fit.

Bulbar Hyperemia4 days

Bulbar hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.

Subjective Satisfaction4 days

Subjective satisfaction for test and control lens was assessed on a scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=very satisfied)

Subjective Ratings for Comfort4 days

Subjective ratings for comfort was assessed for test and control lens on a Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).

Subjective Ratings for Dryness4 days

Subjective ratings for dryness was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

Lens Handling4 Days

Subjective ratings for handling (ease of insertion and removal) was assessed for test and control lens on a scale 0-100, 0=very difficult to handle, 100=easy to handle).

Average Daily Wearing Time4 days

Average daily wearing time for test and control lens is assessed in hours.

Limbal Hyperemia4 days

Limbal hyperemia was assessed on a scale of 0-4 and was used in 0.50 steps, with 0 indicating no hyperemia and 4 indicating severe hyperemia.

Subjective Preference for Near Vision4 days

Subjective preference for near vision for test and control contact lenses. comfort, vision, handling, satisfaction.

Subjective Preference for Intermediate Vision4 days

Subjective preference for intermediate vision for test and control contact lenses.

Subjective Preference for Overall Vision4 days

Subjective preference for overall vision for test and control contact lenses.

Subjective Preference for Comfort4 days

Subjective preference for comfort for test and control contact lenses.

Subjective Preference for Distance Vision4 days

Subjective preference for distance vision for test and control contact lenses.

Subjective Overall Lens Preference4 days

Subjective overall lens preference for test and control contact lenses.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CORL, Indiana University

🇺🇸

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath