MedPath

Effect of Instability on Power and Speed in Bench Press

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Instability, Joint
Interventions
Other: Power and execution speed as a function of instability experience
Registration Number
NCT04771494
Lead Sponsor
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the speed and power parameters in bench press training in different degrees of instability: 1) stable (PBE), 2) with asymmetric load (PBA), 3) with oscillating load (PBO), 4) on fitball (PBF) and 5) on bosu (PBB). For this purpose, 20 male subjects (10 trained and 10 untrained) with specific experience in training under unstable conditions were evaluated with respect to mean propulsive velocity (MPV), maximum velocity (MV) and power (POT) with different types of external load: low load (40% of 1RM), medium load (60% of 1RM) and high load (80% of 1RM) in each condition.

Detailed Description

Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the effect of different degrees of instability on power and speed of execution in the bench press exercise. For the design of this quasi-experimental research, with an ad hoc protocol, an intersubject comparison was used in 5 different conditions. 20 male participants were grouped into two groups based on their previous experience with unstable training and volunteered for this study. Expert group (n= 10; 23.70 ± 4.30 years; 81.40 ± 9.67 kg; 179.50 ± 8.95 cm; 3.5 ± 4.10 years of strength training experience; 9 ± 10.60 months of unstable training experience) Novice group (n= 10; 25.60 ± 6.50 years; 77.80 ± 4.44 kg; 176.40 ± 2.80 cm; 3.40 ± 1.96 years of strength training experience; 0.90 ± 0.99 months of unstable training experience). Subjects with no experience in training with unstable loads (having implemented unstable loads in their training at some point) or current or recent injuries (within the last 6 months) that caused them to alter their normal physical activity were excluded from this study. This study was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). All participants gave written informed consent prior to the study.

Subjects performed the bench press exercise by assessing mean propulsive velocity and power with 3 different loads for each of the unstable situations: light (40% of 1RM), moderate (60% of 1RM) and high (80% of 1RM). In a familiarisation session, subjects performed the relative loads with each condition to determine their strength-velocity profiles and their optimal work percentages. In addition, an incremental load test was performed to determine the 1RM of each of the participants to determine the external load for each load percentage in each of the subjects.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • two years of continuous strength training experience
  • a minimum of 6 months of suspended training experience
Exclusion Criteria
  • Athletes who presented pain or skeletal or neuromuscular disorder

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
UntrainedPower and execution speed as a function of instability experienceParticipants with no previous instability experience
TrainedPower and execution speed as a function of instability experienceParticipants with at least 6 months of training with unstable devices
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Maximum Speed1 month

maximum value of m/s reached during the exercise

Power1 month

the ability to perform different actions, developing maximum strength in a short time

Mean Propulsive Speed1 month

the average speed reached during the concentric phase of the exercise is recorded

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Facultad Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath