Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01319747
NCT01319747TerminatedNot Applicable

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Percutaneous Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Trial

Medisch Spectrum Twente1 site in 1 country77 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2010Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
77
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Recurrence of AF

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Recent studies demonstrated that radiofrequency isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) and surgically video assisted thorascopic pulmonary vein isolation (VATS-PVI) are acceptable or even superior alternatives to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatically paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data comparing effectiveness in both interventions are limited.

The investigators want to compare the effectiveness of PVI and VATS-PVI. Secondary objectives are to compare the duration of hospitalization, quality of Life, cost and to compare the satisfaction of the patients.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients > 18 years of age
  • •Documented, symptomatic, episodes of paroxysmal or persistent AF
  • •During the last 6 months patients must have at least 2 documented episodes of AF, despite the use of at least 1 anti arrhythmic drug.
  • •Able of providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Pregnancy
  • •Unwillingness to use or contra-indications for vitamin K antagonists
  • •Severely enlarged left atrium (>50 mm) on echocardiography
  • •Prior AF ablation or AF surgery
  • •Intracardiac thrombus
  • •Prior heart surgery or pulmonary disease hampering thoracoscopic surgery

Arms & Interventions

VATS therapy

Active Comparator

Intervention: VATS-PVI (Procedure)

Percutaneous therapy

Active Comparator

Intervention: PVI (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence of AF

Time Frame: one year

The percentage of patients without a recurrence of AF, without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), within a follow-up period of at least 12 months after a stabilisation period of 90 days after the initial procedure. An episode of AF is defined as an episode of at least 30 seconds duration.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Treatment impact(one year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

B. Oude Velthuis

B. Oude Velthuis MD

Medisch Spectrum Twente

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials