Effectiveness of the New Perilaryngeal Airway in Comparison With the Laryngeal Mask Airway
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Interventions
- Device: LMADevice: COBRA
- Registration Number
- NCT02439021
- Lead Sponsor
- Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) has been used widely for different patients and found to be highly safe for adult and pediatric patients. However, the LMA has some limitations and weaknesses (e.g. more insertion attempts in 5% to 10 % of all cases. Despite the easy insertion of the LMA, it is crucial to check correct placement of the LMA airway.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
Inclusion Criteria
- BMI between 25 to 35 kg/m2
- scheduled for surgery
- being older than 18 years
- Mallampati class I-III and BMI between 25 and 35
Exclusion Criteria
- pregnancy
- morbid obese (BMI>35 kg/m2)
- a known difficult airway
- gastro-oesophageal reflux
- pharyngeal pathology
- emergency operation with full stomach
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LMA LMA Patients will randomly assign to either LMA or Cobra PLATM CobraPLA COBRA Patients will randomly assign to either LMA or Cobra PLATM
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to intubation Up to 1 hours Time to intubation was measured from inserting of the device to the patient's month while connecting the breathing circuit
Oropharyngeal leak Up to 1 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method incidence of postoperative blood staining on mask Up to 1 hours successful intubation attempt Up to 1 hours A successful intubation attempt was recognized if: the breathing circuit connected, the EtCO2 trace was revealed, and no air leak was detected at airway pressures of 15 cm H2O
incidence of sore throat Up to 1 hours incidence of dysphasia Up to 1 hours