Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04107909
NCT04107909UnknownNot Applicable

Three-port Versus Four-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study

Assiut University0 sites100 target enrollmentStarted: December 30, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
100
Primary Endpoint
compare between the prognosis of three port and four port laproscpic cholecyctectomy

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. we aim to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome of 3 ports LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 ports LC with respect to safety and efficacy.

Detailed Description

Various modifications have been tried in laparoscopic cholecystectomy since its introduction. One, two and three port LC have been performed on limited scale. we aim was to compare three port LC with four port LC in patients with cholelithiasis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 3 ports LC for treatment of cholelithiasis by comparing the result with 4 To study the efficacy and feasibility of 3 port and 4 port lap cholecystetctomy.

  1. To compare the intraoperative and post-operative complications of 3 port and 4 port lap cholecystectomy

  2. Operative time,

  3. Days of hospital stay.

  4. complication

  5. post-operative pain ports LC with respect to safety and efficacy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age of patient between 25 and 65 years
  • •Diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis, symptomatic cholelithiasis

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Choledocholithiasis
  • •Severe Acute Calculus Pancreatitis
  • •Severe co-morbid conditions (uncontrolled diabetes, Hypertension, severe direct hyper bilirubinemia) 4 . Previous operation or adhesion

Arms & Interventions

3 ports

Other

3port operation

Intervention: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Procedure)

4 port

Other

4 port operation

Intervention: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

compare between the prognosis of three port and four port laproscpic cholecyctectomy

Time Frame: 3 years

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohamed Ali Abdelfatah Elshreef

general surgery

Assiut University

Similar Trials