Community Health Workers and Teleaudiology as a Culturally-relevant Approach to Improving Access to Hearing Health Care

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Hearing Loss
• Interventions: Behavioral: Community Health Workers and Teleaudiology as a Culturally-Relevant Approach to Improving Access to Hearing Health Care

• Registration Number: NCT03864003
• Lead Sponsor: University of Arizona

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of a teleaudiology intervention with assistance from Community Health Workers to improve access to hearing health care.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-03-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-03-04
• Study First Posted: 2019-03-06
• Study Start: 2019-10-30
• Primary Completion: 2020-03-27
• Study Completion: 2020-06-04
• Status Verified: 2022-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-05-15
• Last Update Posted: 2022-05-17

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 28

Inclusion Criteria

• Bilateral hearing loss within the fitting range of study hearing aids

Exclusion Criteria

• Medically unqualified to receive hearing aids
• Current hearing aid user
• Cognitively impaired

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Control Group	Community Health Workers and Teleaudiology as a Culturally-Relevant Approach to Improving Access to Hearing Health Care	Participants randomized to the control group will receive hearing aid fitting and verification services via teleaudiology with local, hands-on support from a non-Community Health Worker (undergraduate student in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences).
Experimental group	Community Health Workers and Teleaudiology as a Culturally-Relevant Approach to Improving Access to Hearing Health Care	Participants randomized to the experimental group will receive hearing aid fitting and verification services via teleaudiology with local, hands-on support from a Community Health Worker.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Self-efficacy: The Self-Efficacy for Situational Communication Management Questionnaire	Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after hearing aid fitting	The Self-Efficacy for Situational Communication Management Questionnaire (Jennings, 2005; Jennings et al, 2014) measures self-perceived hearing ability and hearing self-efficacy, or a participant's beliefs in their ability to manage communication with acquired hearing loss. The SESMQ contains 20 situations that are rated on two scales, hearing ability and perceived self-efficacy. Participants respond on a Likert scale from 0 (not well at all) to 10 (very well) to how well they can hear and how well they can manage in each situation. Total scores on each scale range from 0-200, with higher scores representing better perceived self-efficacy and better hearing ability. The two scales are scored and reported separately.; We will evaluate the differences in SESMQ scores between experimental and control groups at 2-weeks post hearing aid fitting. Analyses will utilize baseline data and follow-up analyses will occur for 6-week and 12-week timepoints.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Hearing aid benefit	Baseline, 6 weeks, and 14 weeks after hearing aid fitting	The Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Yueh et al., 2005; EAR) is a subjective scale of hearing aid function and quality of life. The first set of questions is administered before and after the hearing aid fitting, and relates to hearing concerns, including listening in quiet and other situations. The second set of questions relates to functioning with the hearing device, such as fit and convenience, and is administered after the hearing aid fitting.; We will evaluate the differences in inner EAR scores between experimental and control groups at 6-weeks post hearing aid fitting. Analyses will utilize baseline data where appropriate and follow-up analyses will occur for 6-week and 12-week timepoints.; Participants are asked to respond to statements on a five-point scale (i.e. very poor, poor, so-so, good, very good). Each answer is awarded a point. Higher cumulative scores indicate better benefit.
Satisfaction with teleaudiology service delivery	2 weeks after hearing aid fitting	Telehealth Satisfaction Scale (TeSS); The TeSS is a 10-item scale probing satisfaction with telehealth services. Responses are on a 4-point likert scale (Excellent, good, poor, fair). Higher cumulative scores represent better satisfaction.
Average hours of hearing aid usage per day	2 weeks, 6 weeks, 14 weeks after hearing aid fitting	We will ask participants the approximate average hours per day they use their hearing aid. This information will also be collected from the hearing aid programming software.
Qualitative outcomes via semi-structured interviews	14 weeks after hearing aid fitting	Qualitative outcomes will target participants' subjective experience on access to hearing health care, self-efficacy, benefit, and satisfaction with service delivery and hearing aids.
Subjective hearing aid benefit	2 weeks, 6 weeks, 14 weeks after hearing aid fitting	Subjective hearing aid benefit will also be measured using a patient reported outcome measure, the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Participants are asked to respond to seven questions on their experience with their hearing aids. Questions on the IOI-HA are on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Cumulative scores range from zero to 35. Higher scores represent better benefit.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mariposa Community Health Center; 🇺🇸 Nogales, Arizona, United States