MedPath

Effectiveness of a Competency-Based Coordinator of Advance Care Planning (CACP) Competency Enhancement Program: A Mixed Method

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Not Applicable
Registration Number
KCT0009687
Lead Sponsor
Gyeongsang National University
Brief Summary

The participants were 24 experimental and 28 control groups, including nurses, social workers, and legal administrations. The programme consisted of bioethics, end-of-life care, critical thinking, decision-making training through clinical ethics cases, role-playing, communication skills and discussions. After the education, the experimental group showed a significant difference from the control group in critical thinking disposition and hospice and palliative care knowledge. Participants acknowledge that critical thinking education has improved their ability to analyse and evaluate clinical ethical dilemmas. Using clinical ethical dilemma scenarios in interdisciplinary role-playing facilitates team members' communication and helps them view situations or issues from various perspectives.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria

Coordinator of Advance Care Planning working in tertiary general hospitals and general hospitals with the establishment of a medical institution ethics committee
-Those who understand the purpose of this study and agree to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

-Those who do not wish to participate in the study
-Health officials not related to life-sustaining treatment

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional Study
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical decision-making ability;Critical thinking disposition;Knowledge about hospice and palliative care;Global Interpersonal Communication Competence
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Awareness of the role of life-sustaining treatment
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath