Efficacy of a Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabilitation
- Conditions
- Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
- Interventions
- Device: Brain-Computer InterfaceDevice: Sham Brain-Computer Interface
- Registration Number
- NCT05343130
- Lead Sponsor
- Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion
- Brief Summary
The study's main goal is to determine the efficacy of a therapy with brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation for neurorehabilitation of spinal cord injury patients' upper limbs. For this purpose, a randomized controlled trial will be performed to compare the clinical and physiological effects of the brain-computer interface therapy with those of a sham intervention comprised by the application of functional electrical stimulation independently of brain-computer interface control.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
- Spinal Cord Injury at neurological levels C6 or C7
- American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification A, B, C or D
- Upper limb spasticity of less or equal to +1 measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
- Time since disease onset of more than 6 months and less than 60 months
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Severe attention deficits
- Previous diagnosis of traumatic brain injury
- Previous diagnosis of peripheral nerve injury
- Previous stroke diagnosis
- Previous diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases
- History of fractures in upper extremities
- Skin lesions
- Contractures in upper extremities that hamper mobility
- Excessive muscle spasms
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Brain-Computer Interface controlled functional electrical stimulation feedback Brain-Computer Interface - Sham Brain-Computer Interface controlled functional electrical stimulation feedback Sham Brain-Computer Interface -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Capabilities of Upper Extremities Questionnaire (CUE-Q) At enrollment and after 7 weeks of the intervention onset Change of the functional limitation in tetraplegia. Scale ranges from 32 to 224 points if both upper limbs are assessed. A higher score means less functional limitation outcome.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) At enrollment and after 7 weeks of the intervention onset Change of upper limbs function. Scale ranges from 0 to 57 points for each upper limb. A higher score means a better upper limb function.
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) At enrollment and after 7 weeks of the intervention onset Change of upper limbs function. Scale ranges from 0 to 50 points if both upper limbs are assessed. A higher score means a better upper limb function.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III) At enrollment and after 7 weeks of the intervention onset Change of achievements of daily function. Scale ranges from 0 to 100 points. A higher score means a better capacity to perform activities of the daily living.
Life Satisfaction Questionnaire 9 (LISAT-9) At enrollment and after 7 weeks of the intervention onset Change of life satisfaction. Scale ranges from 0 to 54 points. A higher score is expected with a better life satisfaction.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (National Institute of Rehabilitation)
🇲🇽Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico