Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06520176
NCT06520176
Recruiting
Phase 3

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study of Etoposide, Cytarabine Combined With Pegfilgrastim vs. Cyclophosphamide Combined With G-CSF for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University16 sites in 1 country99 target enrollmentAugust 2024

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Cytarabine
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Sponsor
The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University
Enrollment
99
Locations
16
Primary Endpoint
% of patients achieving the collection of ≥5×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, randomized, two-arm, multicenter, exploratory study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination of etoposide, cytarabine and Pegfilgrastim (EAP regimen) for mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). A total of 99 NDMM patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either the EAP regimen or the GC regimen (cyclophosphamide+ G-CSF) to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells. Subsequently, the mobilization effects and adverse reactions of all patients will be observed and compared.

Detailed Description

According to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, 99 newly diagnosed MM patients will be selected. They will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to the EAP group or the CG group. During the hematopoietic stem cell mobilization period, comparison study will be conducted regarding the proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value (CD34 cells \>5×10\^6/kg) after a single collection; the proportion of patients who cumulatively achieve the target collection value (CD34 cells \>2×10\^6/kg) and the ideal collection value; the cumulative collection of CD34 cells and the average number of collections; and the hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions of the EAP and CG regimens. Special attention will be given to the proportion of patients who add Plerixafor in both regimens.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2024
End Date
December 2026
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients newly diagnosed as multiple myeloma.
  • Indication for ASCT.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0\~
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months.
  • Subjects must be able to understand the protocol and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cardiac function class II or higher or cardiac ejection fraction \<40%.
  • Serum direct bilirubin (DBIL)\>2× upper limit of normal (ULN).
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>3× ULN.
  • Serum creatinine clearance rate≤30%.
  • Patients with active infection.
  • Previously received hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Arms & Interventions

EAP regimen group

66 subjects will be enrolled into the EAP regimen group. EAP regimen is the combination of etoposide, cytarabine and PEG-rhG-CSF.

Intervention: Cytarabine

EAP regimen group

66 subjects will be enrolled into the EAP regimen group. EAP regimen is the combination of etoposide, cytarabine and PEG-rhG-CSF.

Intervention: Etoposide

EAP regimen group

66 subjects will be enrolled into the EAP regimen group. EAP regimen is the combination of etoposide, cytarabine and PEG-rhG-CSF.

Intervention: Pegfilgrastim

EAP regimen group

66 subjects will be enrolled into the EAP regimen group. EAP regimen is the combination of etoposide, cytarabine and PEG-rhG-CSF.

Intervention: G-CSF

CG regimen group

33 subjects will be enrolled into the CG regimen group. CG regimen is the combination of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

CG regimen group

33 subjects will be enrolled into the CG regimen group. CG regimen is the combination of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.

Intervention: G-CSF

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

% of patients achieving the collection of ≥5×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg

Time Frame: 1 month

Proportion of patients who achieve the ideal collection value (CD34+ cells ≥5×10\^6/kg) after a single collection

Secondary Outcomes

  • % of patients achieving the collection of ≥2×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg(1 month)
  • CD34+ cells and the average number of collections(1 month)
  • Adverse Rvents (AEs)(1 month)
  • % of patients who use Plerixafor(1 month)

Study Sites (16)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials