Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05885997
NCT05885997Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Implementing a Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Program to Improve Hypertension Control in a Primary Care Network: the MonitorBP Cluster Randomized Trial

Columbia University2 sites in 1 country23,928 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
23,928
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in patient's office systolic blood pressure (SBP)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this research is to determine whether a theory-informed implementation strategy is successful at increasing the uptake of a supported home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) program as well as to determine the effectiveness of this evidence-based practice when implemented across multiple practices serving a diverse patient population.

Detailed Description

Hypertension guidelines now strongly recommend that patients with hypertension monitor their blood pressure (BP) at home (i.e., home BP monitoring; HBPM) as an approach to improving BP control so long as HBPM is conducted with clinical support (i.e., supported HBPM). Yet, few health systems have systematically implemented HBPM programs, and less than 20% of hypertensive patients routinely measure their BP at home, resulting in a gap in the translation of evidence-based recommendations into practice.

While there is strong evidence for Supported HBPM from pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the evidence has been generated from the subgroup of patients and clinicians who volunteered to participate in trials, and the sample sizes have been in the hundreds of patients. There remains a gap in assessing the effectiveness of a scaled-up HBPM program that seeks to maximize the enrollment of primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Accordingly, in partnership with health system leaders at New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and Weill Cornell Medicine, the study investigator leveraged a system-wide investment in telemedicine to develop a telemonitoring-enabled Supported HBPM program. The Supported HBPM program consists of two options for obtaining electronic health record (EHR)-integrated home BP data. The low resource intensity option is designed for patients that can obtain valid home BP devices and are comfortable using the patient portal. It includes digital support to prompt patients to track their home BP readings in the patient portal using their own BP devices with automated triage support for extreme readings. The high resource intensity option is designed for patients that need additional support with HBPM. It involves navigator support with obtaining and using loaned home BP devices that wirelessly transmit data into the EHR and nursing support to triage extreme readings. Both programs can be ordered by clinicians in the EHR and both provide clinicians with weekly summaries of home BP readings with average home BP already calculated.

The study investigator concurrently followed a theory-driven process (the Behavior Change Wheel) to develop an implementation strategy aimed at increasing uptake of the Supported HBPM program. The study investigator now plans to implement and evaluate the Supported HBPM program across practices in the NYP, Weill Cornell Medicine, and ColumbiaDoctors primary care network which is comprised of a socioeconomically diverse patient population.

The study will evaluate the program by conducting a parallel-group cluster randomized trial in which 15 practices will be matched and then randomly assigned to early implementation of the Supported HBPM program (intervention) versus usual care with delayed implementation (i.e., wait-list control). Data will be retrospectively collected from a 12 month period before implementation (pre-implementation periods) as well as from a 12 month period after implementation (post-implementation period) to assess outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Data analysts will be blinded to group assignment when analyzing electronic health record data to determine the effectiveness of the program.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient-level
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Hypertension (as per International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-10 codes)
  • At least one completed primary care office visit during relevant 6-month pre implementation or post-implementation study time period
  • Age 18-85 years old

Exclusion Criteria

  • Advanced dementia or other measure of frailty (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Pregnancy during measurement period (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Stage 5 or end-stage kidney disease (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Terminal illness/in hospice care (as per ICD-10 codes)
  • Practice-level
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Primary care practice that provides care to adult patients affiliated with New York Presbyterian's Ambulatory Care Network, ColumbiaDoctors, or Weill Cornell Medicine, including practices that specialize in HIV medicine
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Medical director declines participation in the trial
  • Site for pilot testing the supported HBPM program or its implementation strategy

Arms & Interventions

Intervention Clinics, Pre-Implementation Period

Experimental

Usual care

Intervention: Usual care (Other)

Intervention Clinics, Post-Implementation Period

Experimental

Access to Supported HBPM program plus a multifaceted implementation strategy designed to increase uptake of the program by primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension

Intervention: Supported HBPM program plus multifaceted implementation strategy (Behavioral)

Control Clinics, Pre-Implementation Period

Other

Usual care

Intervention: Usual care (Other)

Control Clinics, Post-Implementation Period

Other

Usual care

Intervention: Usual care (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in patient's office systolic blood pressure (SBP)

Time Frame: 12 months

Change in patient's office systolic blood pressure (SBP) from index visit to last visit during the subsequent 12 months, among patients with uncontrolled hypertension at the index visit

Secondary Outcomes

  • Office diastolic blood pressure (DBP)(12 months)
  • Change in patient's antihypertensive medication regimen intensity(12 months)
  • Antihypertensive medication adherence(12 months)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension(12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ian Kronish

Associate Professor of Medicine at CUIMC, Associate Director of the Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health

Columbia University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials