MedPath

Assessment of Physical Functioning and Handling of Spiolto® Respimat® in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Requiring Long-acting Dual Bronchodilation in Routine Clinical Practice

Completed
Conditions
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02675517
Lead Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to measure changes in physical functioning - serving as a surrogate for physical activity and exercise capacity - in COPD patients being treated with Spiolto® Respimat® after approximately 6 weeks. A secondary objective is to evaluate the patient¿s general condition (physician¿s evaluation) at visit 1 (baseline visit at the start of the study) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of the study, approx. 6 weeks after visit 1), as well as patient satisfaction with Spiolto® Respimat® at visit 2.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1737
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Spiolto RespimatSpiolto RespimatCOPD patients requiring a fixed combination therapy of two long-acting bronchodilators (LAMA + LABA) according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)guidelines
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Patients With Therapeutic Success at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).after approximately 6 weeks

Therapeutic success defined as a minimum 10-point increase of Physical functioning questionnaire (PF-10 ) score after approximately 6 weeks of Spiolto® Respimat® treatment The PF-10 used for assessing the primary outcome "physical functioning" is a sub-domain of the validated Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire and consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better physical functioning.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)

At Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) patients were asked how satisfied they were by inhaling with the Respimat® device.

Changes in the PF-10 Score From Visit 1 to Visit 2baseline and approx. week 6

Change in PF-10 score was determined by taking into account the individual change of each patient between Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2).

General Condition of the Patient, Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2.Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)

Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) score documented by physicians at visit 1 (baseline) and at visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later). the PGE score documented from 1 to 8. The highest value (=8) representing an excellent general condition

Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)

At Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) patients were asked how satisfied they were with handling of the Respimat® inhalation device

Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)

At Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) patients were asked how overall satisfied they were with the Spiolto® Respimat® treatment.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath