A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of BIVV009 (Sutimlimab) in Participants With Primary Cold Agglutinin Disease Who Have a Recent History of Blood Transfusion (Cardinal Study)
- Registration Number
- NCT03347396
- Lead Sponsor
- Bioverativ, a Sanofi company
- Brief Summary
The purpose of Part A was to determine whether sutimlimab administration resulted in a greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 grams per deciliter (g/dL) increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) levels or increased Hgb to \>= 12 g/dL and obviated the need for blood transfusion during treatment in participants with primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD) who had a recent history of blood transfusion. The purpose of Part B was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of sutimlimab in participants with CAD.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Body weight of >= 39 kg at screening.
- Confirmed diagnosis of primary CAD based on the following criteria: a) Chronic hemolysis; b) Polyspecific direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive; c) Monospecific DAT strongly positive for C3d; d) Cold agglutinin titer >= 64 at 4 degree celsius; e) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) DAT less than or equal to (<=) 1+, and f) No overt malignant disease.
- History of at least one documented blood transfusion within 6 months of enrollment.
- Hemoglobin level <= 10.0 g/dL.
- Bilirubin level above the normal reference range, including participants with Gilbert's Syndrome.
- Cold agglutinin syndrome secondary to infection, rheumatologic disease, or active hematologic malignancy.
- Clinically relevant infection of any kind within the month preceding enrollment (e.g., active hepatitis C, pneumonia).
- Clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus; or other autoimmune disorders with anti-nuclear antibodies at Screening. Anti-nuclear antibodies of long-standing duration without associated clinical symptoms adjudicated on a case-by-case basis during the Confirmatory Review of Patient Eligibility.
- Positive hepatitis panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen and/or hepatitis C virus antibody) prior to or at Screening.
- Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody at screening.
- Treatment with rituximab monotherapy within 3 months or rituximab combination therapies (e.g., with bendamustine, fludarabine, ibrutinib, or cytotoxic drugs) within 6 months prior to enrollment.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description BIVV009 BIVV009 Participants with primary CAD who had a recent history of transfusion (defined as at least 1 transfusion during the last 6 months prior to screening) received an intravenous (IV) infusion of BIVV009 6.5 grams (g) (if body weight was less than \[\<\] 75 kilograms \[kg\]) or BIVV009 7.5 g (if body weight was greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 75 kg) on Day 0 and Day 7 and every 14 days thereafter in Part A up to Week 25. Participants who completed Part A per protocol through the end of treatment visit (Week 26) could continue to receive BIVV009 in Part B, every 2 weeks starting at Week 27 for up to an additional 149 weeks. All participants who completed Part A elected to continue in Part B.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Part A: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment From Week 5 through Week 26 A participant was considered a responder: if he or she did not receive a blood transfusion from Week 5 through Week 26 (end of treatment in Part A) and did not receive treatment for CAD beyond what was permitted per protocol. Additionally, the participant's hemoglobin (Hgb) level must meet either of the following criteria: Hgb level \>= 12 grams per deciliter (g/dL) at the treatment assessment endpoint (defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits), or Hgb increased \>= 2 g/dL from baseline (defined as the last Hgb value before administration of the first dose of study drug) at treatment assessment endpoint. Percentage of responders was calculated together with a 95% exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval (CI).
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) Part B, 6.5 g cohort: From first dose (Week 27) up to 143 weeks of treatment + 9 weeks of follow-up (i.e., up to Week 179); Part B, 7.5 g cohort: From first dose (Week 27) up to 149 weeks of treatment + 9 weeks of follow-up (i.e., up to Week 185) An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TESAEs was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent (TE) period (from the first investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] administration in Part B to the last IMP administration + 9 weeks follow up period).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Levels at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26) Mean change from baseline in bilirubin levels at the treatment assessment timepoint was reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. Least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) was assessed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) approach using heterogeneous Toeplitz (TOEPH) covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Part B: Number of Participants With Response to Participant's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU Visit At Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185) PGIC is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening compared to the start of the study. PGIC was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGIC scores as follows: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse and 7=very much worsen. Higher scores indicated greater severity. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score (Quality of Life) at Treatment Assessment Timepoint Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26) FACIT-Fatigue scale consists of 13 questions assessed using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added to obtain a total score. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating more fatigue. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Part A: Number of Blood Units Transfused Per Participant From Week 5 up to Week 26 A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: -Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic. Number of blood units transfused after the first 5 weeks of study drug administration and up to Week 26 are reported in this outcome measure.
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26) Mean change from baseline (Week 0) in Hgb at treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Each Specified Time Points Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185) Change From Hgb level from baseline (Week 0) at each specified time points (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and early termination/safety follow up \[ET/SFU\] Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part B: Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Levels at Each Specified Time Points Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185) Change from baseline (Week 0) in bilirubin levels at each specified time point (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at the Treatment Assessment Timepoint Baseline, treatment assessment timepoint (i.e., average of Week 23, 25 and 26) Mean change from baseline in LDH at the treatment assessment timepoint is reported in this outcome measure. Treatment assessment timepoint was defined as the average of the values from the Week 23, 25, and 26 visits. LS mean and 95% CI was assessed by MMRM approach using TOEPH covariance matrix with change from baseline as the dependent variable and baseline value and visits as independent variables. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug.
Part A: Number of Blood Transfusions Per Participant From Week 5 up to Week 26 A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic. Number of transfusions after the first 5 weeks of study drug administration and up to Week 26 are reported in this outcome measure.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Score (Quality of Life) at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and Early Termination (ET) Visit/Safety Follow-up Visit Baseline, Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185) FACIT-Fatigue scale consists of 13 questions assessed using a 5-point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added to obtain a total score. The Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating more fatigue. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part B: Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at Each Specified Time Points Baseline, Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185) SF-12: 12 item-questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) contained 12 items, categorized into 8 domains (subscales) of functioning and well-being: physical functioning, role-physical, role emotional, mental health, bodily pain, general health, vitality and social functioning, with each domain score ranged from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores = good health condition. These 8 domains were further summarized into 2 summary scores, PCS and MCS for which, score ranged 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores = better HRQOL. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185). Change from baseline in SF-12 PCS and MCS scores is reported in this outcome measure.
Part B: Change From Baseline in 5-level European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Utility Index and VAS Scores at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU Visit Baseline, Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185) EQ-5D-5L:standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response option: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems measured with Likert scale. EQ-5D-5L responses relating to 5 dimensions are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score=better health state. The EQ-5D-5L VAS rated participant's current health state on a scale from 0=worst imaginable health state to 100 =best imaginable health state. Baseline (Week 0): last non-missing value prior to first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part B: Number of Participants With Response to Participant's Global Impression of (Fatigue) Severity (PGIS) Questionnaire at Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU Visit At Weeks 39, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 111, 123, 135, 147,159, 171 and at ET Visit/SFU visit (i.e., up to Week 185) The PGIS is a self-reported scale. The PGIS is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1=none, 2= mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, 5=very severe. Higher scores indicated greater severity. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Level at Each Specified Time Points Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185) Mean change from baseline in LDH levels at each specified time points (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline (Week 0) was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185).
Part B: Number of Blood Transfusions Per Participant From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176) A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic.
Part B: Number of Blood Units Transfused Per Participant From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176) A participant was to receive a transfusion if his or her Hgb level met either of the following criteria: Hgb was \<9 g/dL and the participant had symptoms of anemia or Hgb was \<7 g/dL and the participant was asymptomatic.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Values at Each Specified Time Points Baseline, Weeks 27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41,43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175, ET/SFU (up to Week 185) Change in Haptoglobin values from baseline at each specified time points (i.e., Weeks 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 83, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 127, 131, 135, 139, 143, 147, 151, 155, 159, 163, 167, 171, 175 and ET/SFU Visit) is reported in this outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first administration of study drug in Part A. ET visit/SFU visit was 9 weeks after administration of last dose (i.e., up to Week 185). Haptoglobin values \<0.2 were imputed as 0.2.
Part B: Number of Healthcare Visits by Type From Week 27 up to 149 weeks of treatment (i.e., up to Week 176) In this outcome measure, number of healthcare visits which included non-study healthcare resource utilization visit (consisted mainly of extra visits to the office of the study doctor, or visit to a generalist doctor, or visit to a specialist doctor) and hospitalization visit and visit to hospital emergency is reported.
Trial Locations
- Locations (49)
Cleveland Clinic
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Michael's Hospital
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Haukeland University Hospital
🇳🇴Bergen, Norway
Oslo University Hospital
🇳🇴Oslo, Norway
University Hospitals Leuven
🇧🇪Leuven, Belgium
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
A. O. Spedali Civili di Brescia
🇮🇹Brescia, Italy
Centre Hospitalier Jolimont
🇧🇪La Louvière, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor
🇫🇷Créteil, France
Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
University College London
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center
🇺🇸Valhalla, New York, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates PC
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
USC/Keck School of Medicine
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
🇺🇸Whittier, California, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Georgetown University Medical Center
🇺🇸Georgetown, District of Columbia, United States
East Carolina University
🇺🇸Greenville, North Carolina, United States
UW Hospitals and Clinics
🇺🇸Madison, Wisconsin, United States
ZNA Stuivenberg
🇧🇪Antwerpen, Belgium
Ballarat Oncology & Haematology
🇦🇺Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
USC Health Clinics
🇦🇺Buderim, Queensland, Australia
Medical University of Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria
Monash Medical Centre
🇦🇺Clayton, Victoria, Australia
University of Alberta
🇨🇦Edmonton, Canada
McGill University Health Center
🇨🇦Montréal, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Caen
🇫🇷Caen, France
Univ Ulm, Inst Klin. Transfusions. Immungen
🇩🇪Ulm, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie-Onkologie
🇩🇪Dresden, Germany
U.O.C. Ematologia- Policlinico "A. Gemelli"
🇮🇹Rome, Italy
Hadassah Medical Center
🇮🇱Jerusalem, Israel
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
🇫🇷Lyon, France
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
🇮🇱Tel Aviv, Israel
Universitätsklinikum Essen
🇩🇪Essen, Germany
Laniado Hospital
🇮🇱Netanya, Israel
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
U.O.C. Ematologia Ospedale San Bortolo
🇮🇹Vicenza, Italy
Tokai University Hospital
🇯🇵Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
Academisch Medisch Centrum
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
Saitama Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Iruma-gun, Saitama-Ken, Japan
Juntendo University Nerima Hospital
🇯🇵Tokyo, Tokyo-To, Japan
St Olavs Hospital, Avdeling for blodsykdommer
🇳🇴Trondheim, Norway
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
🇪🇸Sevilla, Spain
St James Hospital, Leeds
🇬🇧Leeds, United Kingdom
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
🇪🇸Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinci i Provincial de Barcelona
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Montefiore Medical Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States