Prospective evaluation of the dorsal stabilization of the pelvic ring with SACRONAIL in a heterogeneous group of patients
Recruiting
- Conditions
- S32Fracture of lumbar spine and pelvis
- Registration Number
- DRKS00023797
- Lead Sponsor
- SIGNUS Medizintechnik GmbH
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Medical recommendation for the insertion of the SACRONAIL implant
- Age> 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
- Age <18 years
- Patients incapable of giving consent, e.g. due to cognitive limitations
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Patients for whom there is no consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate the clinical outcome one year after surgery. The clinical result is assessed with the evaluation system by Rommens et al (Rommens, et al., 2002). This scoring has already been used for traumatic (Rommens, et al., 2002) and geriatric patients (Mehling, et al., 2012) and is therefore considered appropriate.<br><br>Rommens, P. M. and Hessmann, M. H. 2002. Staged Reconstruction of Pelvic Ring Disruption: Differences in Morbidity, Mortality, Radiologic Results, and Functional Outcomes Between B1, B2 / B3, and C-Type Lesions. Journal of Orthopedic Trauma. 2002, pp. 92-98.<br><br>Mehling, I., Hessmann, M. H. and Rommens, P. M. 2012. Stabilization of fatigue fractures of the dorsal pelvis with a trans-sacral bar. Operative technique and outcome. Injury. 2012, pp. 446-451.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Three different secondary endpoints for assessing efficiency were defined:<br>1. Maintaining / improving the patient's quality of life and patient satisfaction. (SF-12, WET PI)<br>2. The functionality of the pelvic ring. (Majeed Score, Pelvic Outcome Scale)<br>3. The stabilization of the pelvic ring.<br>Assessment of the safety of the implant and surgery is done by assessing the secondary endpoints. (Considering bone healing or the non-occurrence of a fracture)