HM vs Fibreglass Cast Immbolization for Supracondylar Fractures
- Conditions
- Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fracture
- Interventions
- Device: HM CastDevice: Fibreglass Cast
- Registration Number
- NCT05430074
- Lead Sponsor
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital
- Brief Summary
Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children and cast immobilization continues to remain as the recommended treatment for modified Gartland's classification Type I and Type IIa injuries. Apart from plaster of Paris and fibreglass casts, the use of waterproof, tubular hybrid mesh (HM) casts have been gaining traction for cast immobilization. Although the use of HM cast has been reported to have similar clinical outcomes and overall patient satisfaction scores to the fibreglass cast, the results of the recent studies are only limited and generalizable only to paediatric distal radius fractures.
As the application method of HM and fibreglass casts are fundamentally different, it has not been reported if the difference in application duration between the cast materials is significant and its potential implications in outpatient clinic operation.
Hence, through a randomized controlled trial, this study primarily aims to investigate if the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and duration of cast application with the HM casts would be comparable with fibreglass casts in children with supracondylar humeral fractures.
Through this study, the investigators hope to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the respective casting material which may better aid physicians in deciding a more appropriate cast material for treating paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures with cast immobilization and the implications of casting duration on clinic operations.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 79
- First Presentation of Supracondylar humeral fracture (Type I and IIa modified Gartland's classification)
- Prior treatment of supracondylar humeral fracture
- Previous elbow injuries
- Open fractures
- Polytrauma
- Neurovascular injuries
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HM Cast HM Cast - Fibreglass Cast Fibreglass Cast -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence of Skin Rash 4 weeks post-casting The presence of skin rash will be assessed by the study team member upon cast removal.
Clinical Outcome - Loss of Reduction 4 weeks post-casting Based on the radiographs taken 4 weeks after casting, the Baumann's angle will used to assess for any loss of reduction.
Comfort and Overall Satisfaction 4 weeks post-casting Through a questionnaire, the patients and their parents will be asked to rate the patients' experience on adaptability, weight of the cast, itch, heat, sweatiness, smell, comfort and overall satisfaction. For each question, on the scales of 1 to 5, the rating of 1 would designate as the least desirable option and the rating of 5 being the most desirable option.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of Cast Application During Procedure (Cast Application - First Visit) The duration of each cast application with the respective cast materials will be recorded and analysed.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
KK Women's and Children Hospital
πΈπ¬Singapore, Singapore