Comparison between the multi-electrode Octaray and Pentaray catheters in patients undergoing ablation for atrial tachycardia using Coherent Mapping.

• Conditions: atrial-flutter; atrial-tachycardia; 10007521

• Registration Number: NL-OMON53474
• Lead Sponsor: Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 9 April 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Pending
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients planned for ablation of atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter.

Exclusion Criteria

Individuals not able to provide informed consent for any reason including
language and metal disabilities.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>1) number of electrograms per map;<br /><br>2) voltage-based signal to noise ratio per map.</p><br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>1) electrograms acquisition rate per map;<br /><br>2) electrogram acquisition density;<br /><br>3) number of electrograms acquired per beat;<br /><br>4) the total ablation and fluoroscopy times per group;<br /><br>5) acute mapping success per group<br /><br>6) number of entrainments attempted and best post-pacing interval value at<br /><br>ablation site per group, when available.</p><br>