IRCT20210609051529N1已完成3 期
Clinical retention comparison of fissure sealant versus flowable composite in type I adhesive conservative restorations after preparation with self etch bonding in children age 6-12
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 55
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 years 至 12 years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Age group 6-12 years
- •Existence of first mandibular molar with caries limited to enamel on occlusal surface on both sides
- •Evidence of good oral hygiene at home (regular brushing, flossing, regular fluoride therapy)
- •Patient cooperation and acceptance of treatment (according to Frankel classification in group 3 or 4)
- •No treatment has been done on the desired teeth before
- •The molar is fully grown and can be isolated
- •No proximal caries (evaluation by bite wing and clinical radiography)
排除标准
- •History of a medical condition that may interfere with treatment
- •Consumption of drugs that affect saliva and its quality
- •Mention the history of allergies to any of the restorative materials
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of clinical retention of fissure sealants with and without using sodium hypochlorite after enamel etchingIRCT20210621051650N1Tabriz University of Medical Sciences37
已完成
不适用
The clinical comparison of two methods for sealing fissures of young permanent teethclinical evaluation of two fissure sealant therapy methods.dental examinationIRCT138811053168N1Reasearch Vice-Chancellor- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences80
已完成
2 期
Comparison of pit and fissure sealant retention following bioactive glass air abrasioo.-IRCT2014060117934N1Vice chancellor for research, Isfahan Univercity of Medical Sciences180
已完成
不适用
Clinical Performance of Two Fissure SealantsCaries Pit and Fissure Limited to EnamelNCT03470129Ivoclar Vivadent AG92
已完成
3 期
Comparison of two tooth sealing systems for preventing dental decay among twelve year old school children in Chennai.CTRI/2017/09/009829Brinda B50