Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03485859
NCT03485859CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Abdominal Binder aftEr Laparoscopic Treatment on Postoperative Recovery (BELT): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital2 sites in 1 country66 target enrollmentStarted: April 20, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
66
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
postoperative pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

There have been no studies exploring the efficacy of incision support using an elastic abdominal binder after laparoscopy to date. The investigators performed therefore a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of post-laparoscopic abdominal binder use on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients with gynecologic disease.

Detailed Description

An abdominal elastic binder (girdles, trusses, abdominal belts, longuette, etc.) is a wide belt that surrounds the abdomen and supports the incision . Abdominal binder is routinely used after open surgery and Cesarean section, because it has been reported, according to a recent systematic review, to facilitate enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) such as pain relief, reduced risk of seroma formation, improved respiratory function, and assisted physical function using additional support to the lower abdominal musculature.

However, the routine use of abdominal binder after laparoscopy has been challenged due to a potential risk of postoperative pulmonary complications and deep venous thrombosis due to increased intra-abdominal pressure. Also, abdominal binders after laparoscopy have been criticized for being uncomfortable and hot to wear and for impinging the breast line in females. Therefore, some laparoscopists prefer the use of abdominal binder in patients undergoing laparoscopy, while other laparoscopists did not. However, there have been no studies exploring the efficacy of incision support using an elastic abdominal binder after laparoscopy to date. The investigators performed therefore a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of post-laparoscopic abdominal binder use on ERAS in patients with gynecologic disease.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • age between 18 and 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) classification I-II
  • absence of pregnancy at the time of surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2
  • history of abdominal surgery within 6 months
  • history of ventral or incisional hernia
  • walking disabilities (or walking with the assistance of crutches or a walker)
  • chronic obstructive respiratory disease
  • stage IV cancer,
  • chronic pain syndrome (defined as daily intake of opioids for chronic back pain, chronic headache, or fibromyalgia)
  • inability to fill out the questionnaire

Arms & Interventions

Experimental group

Experimental

In subjects allocated to the abdominal binder group, the abdomen binder with a standard height of 22 cm (Sejung Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was applied before leaving the operating room. The binder was placed on the abdomen across the laparoscopic incision, with the upper border not higher than the lower margin of the rib cage, ensuring minimal restriction of lateral costal expansion and diaphragmatic excursion. Subjects were carefully instructed to use the abdominal binder during at least the first 2 consecutive days and night, and to reposition the abdominal binder correctly when needed.

Intervention: Experimental group (Device)

Control group

Placebo Comparator

In subjects allocated in the control group, subjects were not given any opportunity to ware an abdominal binder.

Intervention: Control group (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

postoperative pain

Time Frame: at 48 hours after surgery

Subjects rated postoperative pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. The scale was presented as a 10-cm line with verbal descriptors ranging from "no pain" to "worst imaginable pain".

Secondary Outcomes

  • Incentive spirometry performance(at 24 hours after surgery)
  • limitation of walking ability(at 48 hours after surgery)

Investigators

Sponsor
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Taejong Song

Professor

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials