A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of QM1114-DP for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines and Glabellar Lines Alone or in Combination

Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Lateral Canthal Lines Investigator and Subject Assessments at Maximum Smile

时间窗: Month 1

Investigator 4-point Photographic Scale of Lateral Canthal Line represents LCL severities from none (grade 0), mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), to severe (grade 3). Each grade is also depicted by an individual photograph and descriptive text. The Investigators used the LCL-ILA for direct, live comparison with the subject's face for grading LCL severity. Left and right LCL were assessed at maximum smile. Subject 4-point Photographic Scale of Lateral Canthal Line Severity represents LCL severities from Level 0, Level 1, Level 2, to Level 3. Each grade is also depicted by an individual photograph and descriptive text. Subjects made their assessments independently of the Investigator's assessment. Subjects evaluated their LCL severity (left and right side separately) at maximum smile.

Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Glabellar Lines Investigator and Subject Assessments at Maximum Frown

时间窗: Month 1

Investigator 4-point Photographic Scale of Glabellar Line Severity represents the severity of GL from none (grade 0), mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2) to severe (grade 3). Each grade is depicted by an individual photograph and a descriptive text. The Investigators used the 4-point Photographic Scale for direct, live comparison with the subject's face at maximum frown. Subjects made their assessment of glabellar line severity independently of the Investigator's assessment. Subjects were asked to evaluate their GL at maximum frown by grading the GL severity from none (grade 0, smooth skin), mild (grade 1, fairly smooth skin), moderate (grade 2, frown lines) to severe (grade 3, deep frown lines).