Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01157013
NCT01157013CompletedNot Applicable

The Role of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging in the Evaluation of Response to Sorafenib Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hospital Miguel Servet2 sites in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
40
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Response to sorafenib therapy shown in PET Scans

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) evaluates cancer cell glycolysis(Warburg effect) as a surrogate for tumor response.The hypothesis of this study is that early changes in FDG-PET signal can predict sorafenib response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health issue worldwide, particularly in Asia and Africa, and a disease that has increased in incidence in the Western world over the past 20 years primarily as a result of the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection, which predisposes patients to HCC.

Sorafenib (a new oral potent multikinase inhibitor directed against both tumour proliferation and angiogenesis) can be considered standard of care for patients with advanced and metastatic HCC who are not candidates for curative or locoregional therapies. Clinical benefit has been shown in 75% of patients with advanced HCC.

PET is a noninvasive imaging technique which might be an effective tool for evaluating sorafenib treatment in HCC. The aim of this study is to evaluate this new treatment with PET with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), since the use of only computed tomography (CT) measurements can be questioned. Our hypothesis is that early effects of sorafenib treatment in advanced HCC can be detected and quantified by PET-CT after one month of treatment. We try to reveal a decrease in tumour glucose uptake at one month and correlate it with other radiologic findings (measured by CT and diffusion-weighted nuclear resonance imaging) and the more clinically relevant endpoints clinical benefit and overall survival.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic assessment by biopsy/cytology; in cirrhotic patients conventional radiologic criteria are also accepted
  • more than 18 years of age.
  • life expectancy greater than three months
  • candidate to sorafenib therapy
  • informed consent required

Exclusion Criteria

  • hepatocellular carcinoma patients candidate to local/curative therapies(surgery/radiofrequency/TACE/other local therapy
  • another active cancer than primary liver cancer

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Response to sorafenib therapy shown in PET Scans

Time Frame: Baseline and after three weeks on treatment

Changes in the SUVmax during treatment (SUVmax) were determined by the following equation: (post-treatment SUVmax - baseline SUVmax)/baseline SUVmax, expressed in percentage. The SUVmax for all target lesions were averaged(mSUVmax) and reported per the 1999 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Tumor response evaluated by CT and MRI(Basal and every two months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Hospital Miguel Servet
Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Role of Positron Emission Tomography in... | Clinical Trial