Study of the Patient Radiation Dose During Five Endourological Procedures
- Conditions
- Radiation ExposureUrolithiasis
- Interventions
- Radiation: frames per second
- Registration Number
- NCT06384105
- Lead Sponsor
- Universiteit Antwerpen
- Brief Summary
In the medical world more and more procedures are performed with the use of ionizing radiation (x-ray), both diagnostic and therapeutic. The main and most known risk is the development of malignancies as a result of the use of ionizing radiation.
Purpose of this study: To examine the patient radiation dose (PRD) if the frames per second (FPS) are set differently during the five most performed endourological procedures where fluoroscopy is used (insertion/replacement of ureteral stent, (mini-)percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL/PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL/SWL)) and to propose an acceptable PRD for these procedures in a multicentric study.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 870
- all patients who receive insertion/replacement of ureteral stent, URS (flexible or semirigid), (mini-)PCNL (including ECIRS) or ESWL under fluoroscopic with or without ultrasonic guidance
- Only cases performed or directly supervised by experts
- Bilateral cases
- Diagnostic ureterorenoscopies
- Antegrade ureteroscopies
- Procedures for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC)
- Procedures on children (aged <18 years)
- Pregnant women
- Abnormal urinary anatomy (e.g. ureteral duplication, pelvic kidney, bladder derivation, horseshoe kidney)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description FPS >5-8 frames per second Frames per second are set at \>5-8 at the beginning of the procedure FPS 3-5 frames per second Frames per second are set at 3-5 at the beginning of the procedure
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Dose limit 1 year Dose limit for the PRD during the insertion or replacement of a ureteral stent, URS, PCNL and ESWL
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in PRD 1 year Difference in the PRD during the insertion or replacement of a ureteral stent, URS, PCNL and ESWL when the FPS are set to 3 to 5 compared to \>5 to 8
PRD different centres 1 year PRD differ between the different participating urologists and centres
PRD difference complicated cases 1 year PRD difference between normal and complicated cases
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
UZA
đŸ‡§đŸ‡ªEdegem, Antwerp, Belgium
AZ Klina
đŸ‡§đŸ‡ªBrasschaat, Antwerp, Belgium