MedPath

Effect of Static vs. Conversational AI-Generated Messages on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intent: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer Control and Prevention
Registration Number
NCT07107152
Lead Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether messages generated by a large language model (LLM), including both static and conversational formats, can increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intentions among U.S. adults aged 45-75 who have never completed CRC screening. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do personalized, AI-generated messages increase the self-reported likelihood of completing a stool-based CRC screening test within 12 months?

Do they also increase intent to undergo colonoscopy screening within 12 months?

Researchers will compare four groups: (1) no message control, (2) expert-written patient education materials, (3) a single AI-generated persuasive message, and (4) a motivational interviewing-style AI chatbot. These comparisons will help assess whether a conversational format offers added benefit over static AI or expert-generated content.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to one of the four study arms

Spend at least 3 minutes reading or interacting with their assigned material

Complete pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing intent to receive CRC screening

Receive messages tailored to their self-reported demographics, including age, political ideology, gender, education, community setting (urban, rural, suburb), self-reported health, and the last time they saw their PCP

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
915
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults aged 45 to 75 years
  • Currently residing in the United States
  • Self-reported no prior colorectal cancer screening (or unsure if screened)
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Consent to participate in a behavioral research study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous colonoscopy, stool test, sigmoidoscopy, or CT colonography
  • Failure to pass pre- or post-intervention attention checks
  • Identified as non-human respondents by reCAPTCHA or other automated bot detection
  • Completion time significantly shorter than the median, indicating inattentiveness

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Self-Reported Likelihood of Completing Stool Test Screening for Colorectal CancerImmediately before and after the intervention (single session; same day)

Measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = "Extremely unlikely" and 100 = "Extremely likely." Assessed before and after the intervention. Change in score indicates difference in participant intention to complete a stool-based CRC screening test.

Change in Self-Reported Likelihood of Completing Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal CancerImmediately before and after the intervention (single session; same day)

Measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = "Extremely unlikely" and 100 = "Extremely likely." Assessed before and after the intervention. Change in score reflects shift in participant intention to complete a colonoscopy within the next 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Perceived Empathy of the InterventionImmediately after the intervention (single session)

Participants rate how empathetic they found the assigned message or chatbot interaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher values indicate greater perceived empathy.

Comfort Discussing CRC Screening with a ProviderImmediately before and after the intervention (single session; same day)

Measured on a 0-100 scale where 0 = "Not at all comfortable" and 100 = "Extremely comfortable." Assessed pre- and post-intervention to detect changes in self-reported comfort discussing colorectal cancer screening with a primary care provider.

Perceived Message EffectivenessImmediately after the intervention (single session)

Participants rate the persuasive effectiveness of the assigned content using a previously developed public health message effectiveness scale.

Change in Reasons for CRC Screening HesitancyImmediately before and after the intervention (single session)

Participants rate the importance of 13 pre-defined concerns about CRC screening on a 0-100 scale (e.g., cost, discomfort, necessity). Changes in ratings pre- to post-intervention reflect shifts in perceived barriers.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Participants are recruited online via Prolific

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Participants are recruited online via Prolific
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.