MedPath

P.E.M.F. Therapy of Chronic Wounds

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Chronic Wounds
Interventions
Other: Pulsed ElectroMagnetic (PEMF) therapy
Device: Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy
Registration Number
NCT05493943
Lead Sponsor
PEMF Systems, Inc.
Brief Summary

To measure the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) as an adjunct wound care therapy.

Detailed Description

The goal of the three-arm trial is to employ application of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) directly over chronic wounds combined with standard of care local wound therapy (SOC). Three different PEMF devices, one a low power system (LP-PEMF), another a high power system (HP-PEMF) and the third a sham device that does not emit energy (S-PEMF) will be employed as adjuncts to standard wound care. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that exposure of wounds to one of the PEMF devices leads to significantly better and faster healing than the sham system.

Research Design:

An investigator initiated, prospective, double blinded parallel three arm treatment study. Subjects are randomized to receive one of the three PEMF devices (LP-PEMF, HP-PEMF or sham device) twice daily for 15 minutes directly over a wound. Initially, 40 subjects from each treatment group will be enrolled for total of 120 subjects at VA Long Beach Healthcare System (VALB) at the interim analysis. Based on the results of that analysis, one of the treatment arms will be eliminated and a follow-up study will continue with the remaining two arms. Additional 60 to 100 subjects are to be enrolled after interim analysis and the study may expand to Greater Los Angeles Medical Center. The study is expected to last 2 years.

Participating eligible subjects will be asked to come to the VALB once a week for 14 weeks and then for 2 or 3 visits over 8 more weeks. The total number of visits including the first visit could be up to 17 visits in 5 months. The study has three phases: Screening phase (2 weeks); Treatment phase (12 weeks); and Follow-up phase (8 weeks). Subjects participation in the study may last up to 22 weeks, but subjects who heal early during the Treatment phase will have a reduced period of participation based on when their wound heals.

Methodology

Inclusion criteria include age ≥21 years; presence of venous leg ulcers (VLU), Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) or Pressure Ulcers (PU); wound size between 2 and 30 cm2; no exposed joint, tendon or bone, no tunneling or sinus tracts; wound duration ≥ 6 weeks.

Each wound will be reviewed for eligibility by assessing with duplex ultrasound, skin changes, tendon/bone/joint involvement, Ankle brachial Pressure Index (ABI), BMI, Hemoglobin A1c, Albumin and other medical history.

Female subjects who are currently breast feeding or capable of conceiving and all males capable of insemination must use an acceptable form of contraception in order to participate in the study (acceptable forms of contraception include condoms for males and contraceptive pills or IUDs for women).

Findings: None

Clinical Significance: Potentially beneficial treatment option for veterans with diabetic foot ulcer, venous leg ulcers or pressure ulcers.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PEMF Sham controlPulsed ElectroMagnetic (PEMF) therapyControl arm using a sham PEMF device.
PEMF low powerPulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapyPEMF therapy using a device with low pulse intensity.
PEMF medium powerPulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapyPEMF therapy using a medium pulse intensity.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to complete healing12 weeks

Complete re-epithelization of wound

Wound closure12 weeks

Squared milimeters of wound closure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number and type of adverse events12 weeks

Safety Endpoint

Device effectiveness12 weeks

Compare the rate of effectiveness between performance of the two PEMF power levels by measuring percentage of wound closure

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath