Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03102333
NCT03102333CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison: Constant-rate Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing VS Variable-rate

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine2 sites in 1 country78 target enrollmentStarted: December 30, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
78
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Demanded numbers of bolus button

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently.

Detailed Description

In the case of the existing iv-pca, the analgesic drug was injected into the patient at a constant rate (ex. 1 ml / hr) and additional pain was controlled through the bolus dose (1 ml).

As a result, the analgesic effect was insufficient, or the effect was excessive, causing side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation, dizziness). Especially In spinal surgery, the degree of pain sharply decreases from day 1 to day 2. Classic iv-pca with constant infusion rate can not reflect this result. But in the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently. If the bolus button is not pressed for a certain period of time, it is expected that the injection rate will be reduced and the side effect caused by the analgesic agent will be decreased.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Spine fusion surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital with IV- PCA under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unrecorded type of anesthetic agent
  • Denial to the study
  • Brain disorder
  • Cardiopulmonary disease
  • Psychiatric disorders

Arms & Interventions

Constant-rate Infusion

Active Comparator

INTERVENTION : Constant-rate Infusion mode : The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period

Intervention: Constant-rate Infusion mode (Device)

Variable-rate Feedback Infusion

Active Comparator

INTERVENTION : Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode :The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period

Intervention: Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Demanded numbers of bolus button

Time Frame: Change from immediately to 24 hours after operation

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pain intensity(Change from immediately to 24 hours after operation)

Investigators

Sponsor
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Chongwha Baek

Professor

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials