Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2025/09/094986
CTRI/2025/09/094986
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3

A placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial comparing capecitabine with megestrol acetate or capecitabine with placebo in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (CAMEO Study)

Tata Memorial Hospital1 site in 1 country366 target enrollmentStarted: October 8, 2025Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
366
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving capecitabine with Megestrol

Overview

Brief Summary

Study Design: This is a placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial.

Background: There is an unmet need for effective treatment for patients with hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer that have progressed on two lines of endocrine-based therapy. Novel agents being investigated in this setting pose significant financial toxicity with disease control ranging from 7 to 13 months in the 2nd or 3rd line of therapy. Combination chemotherapy with hormone therapy could address the intra-tumoral heterogeneity post multiple lines of therapy. Megestrol acetate has demonstrated response rates of 30 percentage and median progression-free survival of 3 months in heavily pre-treated patients with MBC, irrespective of estrogen and/or progesterone receptor status. In a non-randomized trial, the addition of chemotherapy to MA in 29 heavily pretreated MBC patients reported a median PFS of 7 months and no significant toxicities. Hence, we hypothesize that combination of MA with chemotherapy will improve PFS in patients with HR+ MBC. In this study, we are testing this hypothesis by comparing two arms: MA plus capecitabine vs capecitabine plus placebo.

Aim:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination capecitabine and megestrol acetate in patients with HR positive  MBC who are chemotherapy naïve.

Primary Objective: To compare progression-free survival between patients receiving capecitabine with megesterol acetate versus capecitabine with placebo which is Identical to MA

Secondary Objective: To compare the 2 groups for: Overall Survival between both arms, objective response rates in patients with measurable disease ,Clinical Benefit Rate, Safety , Quality of Life

Key Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 and above years ,post-menopausal women or pre-menopausal women on ovarian suppression, Histologically proven breast cancer:  In advanced or metastatic stage HR positive either estrogen receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive as per ASCO-CAP guidelines HER2 negative defined as IHC 2 positive/ISH negative or IHC 0 and 1 positive. Received at least two lines of endocrine-based therapy for advanced or metastatic disease or had cancer progression while undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Prior CDK4 or 6 inhibitor is mandatory.  Have received no prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. ECOG PS less than 2.

Key Exclusion Criteria: Contraindication to capecitabine. Patients with prior megestrol acetate or current exposure to natural/synthetic progesterone compounds.Patients with uncontrolled brain metastases. Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism or known thrombophilia

Treatment Plan: Consenting patients will be randomly assigned to Arm A Experimental Group : Megestrol acetate (MA) 160 mg per oral once a day with capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles Arm B Control Group: Placebo which is identical in appearance with Megestrol acetate with capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles Treatment will continue until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient decision to stop.

Follow-up assessments: Patients will be followed up for clinical assessment and laboratory parameters every 21 window period of pluse or minus 3 days. Assessment of disease status with contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis will be performed every 12 window period of pluse or minus 1 weeks. After disease progression, subsequent treatment administration will be as per standard institutional practice, and patients will be followed up every 3 months until death.

Statistical Consideration: This is randomised, placebo-controlled, phase III trial in which 332 patients with MBC will be randomized with equal probability to one of two possible treatment regimens: MA 160 mg per oral once a day with capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles or Placebo (identical in appearance to MA) administered per oral once a day and capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles. With 329 PFS events, the log-rank test has a power of 0.90 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.70  an increasing the median PFS from 6 months to 8 months with a two-sided type I error rate of 0.05. The following calculations assume a monthly accrual rate of 9 patients or month accrued over a 39 month period, followed for 24 months after study closure and that PFS is assumed to follow an exponential distribution.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 80.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 and above years.
  • Post-menopausal women or pre-menopausal women on ovarian suppression Histologically proven breast cancer: In advanced or metastatic stage HR positive either estrogen receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive as per ASCO-CAP guidelines HER2 negative defined as IHC 2 positive/ISH negative or IHC 0 and 1 positive.
  • Received at least two lines of endocrine-based therapy for advanced or metastatic disease or had cancer progression while undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy.
  • Prior CDK4 or 6 inhibitor is mandatory.
  • Have received no prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.
  • ECOG PS less than 2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Contraindication to capecitabine.
  • Patients with prior megestrol acetate or current exposure to natural/synthetic progesterone compounds.
  • Patients with uncontrolled brain metastases.
  • Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism or known thrombophilia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving capecitabine with Megestrol

Time Frame: PFS (time from randomisation until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death, whichever occurs first)

acetate (MA) versus capecitabine with placebo (Identical in appearance with Megestrol acetate )

Time Frame: PFS (time from randomisation until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death, whichever occurs first)

Secondary Outcomes

  • To compare the 2 groups for: Overall Survival (OS) between both arms, Tumour response rates in patients with measurable disease (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Safety (side effects), Quality of Life (QOL).(OS: Survival follow-up every 3 months after progression until death)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Research institution and hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Anuradha Mehta

Tata Memorial Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials