Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Shade Matching of Vita Suprinity Versus Lithium Disilicate (E-max) Ceramic Crowns in Esthetic Zone
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 26
- Primary Endpoint
- Patient satisfaction using Visual Analogue scale- Binary (Satisfied or not satisfied)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate using of new ceramic material Vita Suprinity and lithium disilicate on patient satisfaction combined with shade matching.
Detailed Description
Justification for undertaking the trial:
Nowadays, esthetics has become an important aspect of dentistry due to decrease in caries prevalence and increase in patients' perception of their teeth appearance. Therefore dentists should take into consideration the esthetic needs of the patients during treatment, otherwise patient satisfaction will not be achieved with its subsequent influence on patient self quality of life and psychological status.
As a survey concerning patient satisfaction with regard to dental esthetics issues concluded that color of the restoration plays a primary role for patient satisfaction, as 89.3% of patients were dissatisfied of their dental appearance because of their restorations' color.
Therefore the use of ceramic crowns has increased substantially in recent years because of their superior esthetics and color rendering. In addition to their ability to achieve complete patient satisfaction.
Rationale:
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age range of the patients from 20-60 years old; able to read and sign the informed consent document, illiterate patient will be avoided.
- •Patients able physically and psychologically to tolerate conventional restorative procedures.
- •Patients with no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, having teeth with good restorations.
- •Patients with teeth problems indicated for full coverage restoration (e.g. mild to moderate discoloration, coronal fracture where partial coverage would lack retention, malposed or malformed teeth).
- •Patients with root canal treated teeth requiring full coverage restorations.
- •Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
- •Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
- •Pregnant women's to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office due to pregnancy or due to injected anesthetic solution.
- •Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation (patient that has phobia from dental treatments or needle bunch).
- •Patients have no opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration.
- •Patients suffer from parafunctional habits.
Arms & Interventions
lithium disilicate
The intervention will be: Prosthetic crown
Intervention: Prosthetic crown (Other)
Vita suprinity
The intervention will be: Prosthetic crown
Intervention: Prosthetic crown (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Patient satisfaction using Visual Analogue scale- Binary (Satisfied or not satisfied)
Time Frame: 1 year
Secondary Outcomes
- Shade matchUsing the modified United States Public Health Service criteria (Modified USPHS)- categorical(1 year)
Investigators
Sameh Abou-steit
Principal investigator, Assisstant lecturer
Cairo University