MedPath

Rate of Leg Curl to Leg Press During Isokinetic Testing

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Muscle Strain
Interventions
Device: Isokinetic leg extension/-flexion on a legpress device
Device: Isokinetic leg extension/-flexion on a legcurl device
Registration Number
NCT03966690
Lead Sponsor
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
Brief Summary

The functional condition of the leg muscles is not only relevant to performance in sports, but is also of great importance in health, prevention and rehabilitation, where not only the general strength level is decisive but also the relationship between individual muscle groups. Among other things the H-Q-ratio (strength ratio of "hamstring" muscles to quadriceps muscles) is often used to diagnose possible imbalances. Isokinetic force measurements have established themselves as the gold standard in competitive football. In this context, however, force tests in the open kinetic chain (OKC) have almost exclusively been used so far. Especially force measurements in the closed kinetic chain (CKC) could have a higher relevance regarding functionality. The H-Q-ratio should better be called the flex-ext-ratio in the CKC due to the involvement of the hip muscles. There is little data in the literature on leg force or flex-ext-ratio in CKC. In particular, there is hardly any comparative data for isokinetic measurement systems in the CKC. Using a cross over design and randomly allocating 28 competitive football players into two groups (n=14 each) that either started tests with the leg press or legcurl device, the investigators assumed (1) a significantly lower flex-ext-ratio in the CKC compared to the OKC, (2) a correlation between the isokinetic measurement systems in the OKC and the CKC, and (3) a significant superiority of the leg press to predict functional performance of the lower limbs.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
28
Inclusion Criteria
  • male elite soccer players (5th-6th German soccer division)
Exclusion Criteria
  • no acute injuries

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
legpress device startersIsokinetic leg extension/-flexion on a legcurl deviceGroup A randomly assigned to start with legpress device
leg curl device startersIsokinetic leg extension/-flexion on a legpress deviceGroup A randomly assigned to start with legcurl device
leg curl device startersIsokinetic leg extension/-flexion on a legcurl deviceGroup A randomly assigned to start with legcurl device
legpress device startersIsokinetic leg extension/-flexion on a legpress deviceGroup A randomly assigned to start with legpress device
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Leg extension/leg-flexion rateat baseline

Rate of leg extension to leg-flexion

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Isokinetic leg flexors strengthat baseline

Maximum isokinetic strength of the leg flexors as determined by an isokinetic legpress device (Physiomed, Laipersdorf, Germany)

Isokinetic leg extensors strengthat baseline

Maximum isokinetic strength of the leg extensors as determined by an isokinetic legpress device (Physiomed, Laipersdorf, Germany)

Y-Balance Testat baseline

Dynamic motor-control as determined by the Y-Balance test

Maximum jumping heightat baseline

Maximum jumping height as determined by the counter movement jump

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg

🇩🇪

Erlangen, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath