Performance and Team Pre-critical Staff Before Critical Event in High Fidelity Simulation for Anesthesiology Residents

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Healthy
• Interventions: Behavioral: precritical staff

• Registration Number: NCT02599584
• Lead Sponsor: Claude Bernard University

Brief Summary

Simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur and plannification of team resources and priority in the treatment strategy may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a liberal preparation team staff of 4 min, suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts.

Detailed Description

High fidelity simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur, plannification of team resources, priority in the treatment strategy and effective communication within the team, may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a preparation team staff of 4 min. This staff will be suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts. The investigators are going to compare groups of anesthesiology residents going through same scenarios of simulated critical events in high fidelity simulation session. Scenarios will be recorded to be analyzed by 2 reviewers independantly. A checklist of appropriate treatment and a non technical skill checklist will be use to cote team performance. Stress of the participants will be assessed by visual analogic scale of participants anxiety and stress. the two groups (preparation staff or no preparation staff) will be compare to see if improvement in team performance is associated with the intervention.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2015-11
• Study First Submitted: 2015-11-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2015-11-05
• Study First Posted: 2015-11-06
• Primary Completion: 2016-06
• Study Completion: 2016-06
• Status Verified: 2020-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-02-27
• Last Update Posted: 2020-03-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 44

Inclusion Criteria

• Anesthesiology resident in the education simulation curriculum

Exclusion Criteria

• no verbal consent

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
precritical staff	precritical staff	4 min of precritical team staff for anticipation of risk and role attribution during the critical events if they occur. athe staff will take place after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
performance	one week (review video)	performance scale cotation (rated from 0 to 100 by 2 independant experts) (technikal and non technikal skills scale)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
stress	min 0, min 4 and min 15 (just after the scenario)	visual analogic scale (transfer to metrics from 0 to 100) of the stress felt by the residents at the time of the cotation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CLESS; 🇫🇷 Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France