The Periodontal Status and Failure Rates With Different Retainer Bonding Techniques Using One-step Adhesive
- Conditions
- Periodontal Inflammation
- Interventions
- Procedure: Baseline periodontal measurements (T0)Procedure: Periodontal measurements (T1)Procedure: Periodontal measurements (T2)Procedure: Retainer failure rates
- Registration Number
- NCT05458583
- Lead Sponsor
- Pamukkale University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate fixed retainers, bonded with either direct or indirect techniques using one- or two-step adhesives, in terms of periodontal status and failure rates.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Good treatment outcomes
- good oral hygiene
- No systemic or periodontal problems
- No extraction or missing anterior teeth and restorations
- Patients unwilling to wear a fixed retainer
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Direct bonding with one-step adhesive Baseline periodontal measurements (T0) The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using one-step adhesive Direct bonding with conventional adhesive Retainer failure rates The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Direct bonding with conventional adhesive Periodontal measurements (T2) The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Direct bonding with one-step adhesive Periodontal measurements (T1) The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using one-step adhesive Direct bonding with conventional adhesive Periodontal measurements (T1) The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Indirect bonding with conventional adhesive Periodontal measurements (T1) The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Indirect bonding with one-step adhesive Periodontal measurements (T2) The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using one-step adhesive Direct bonding with conventional adhesive Baseline periodontal measurements (T0) The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Direct bonding with one-step adhesive Retainer failure rates The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using one-step adhesive Indirect bonding with conventional adhesive Baseline periodontal measurements (T0) The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Indirect bonding with conventional adhesive Periodontal measurements (T2) The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Indirect bonding with one-step adhesive Retainer failure rates The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using one-step adhesive Direct bonding with one-step adhesive Periodontal measurements (T2) The fixed retainer was applied with direct bonding technique using one-step adhesive Indirect bonding with conventional adhesive Retainer failure rates The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using two-step (conventional) adhesive Indirect bonding with one-step adhesive Baseline periodontal measurements (T0) The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using one-step adhesive Indirect bonding with one-step adhesive Periodontal measurements (T1) The fixed retainer was applied with indirect bonding technique using one-step adhesive
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Plaque index measurements 12 months (T2) after bonding Plaque index was scored by a specialized periodontist on the mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual sides of each tooth at 12 months after bonding based on the following scale: 0 (no plaque), 1 (a film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth), 2 (moderate accumulation of soft deposits within the gingival pocket, or on the tooth and gingival margin which can be seen with the naked eye) and 3 (abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin).
All measurements were performed using acrylic stents to ensure reproducible placement of the periodontal probe (PCP 15 UNC, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL).Gingival index measurements 12 months (T2) after bonding Gingival index was scored by a specialized periodontist on the mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual sides of each tooth at 12 months after bonding based on the following scale: 0 (absence of inflammation), 1 (mild inflammation), 2 (moderate inflammation) and 3 (severe inflammation).
All measurements were performed using acrylic stents to ensure reproducible placement of the periodontal probe (PCP 15 UNC, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL).Calculus index measurements 12 months after bonding Calculus index was scored by a specialized periodontist on the mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual sides of each tooth at 12 months after bonding based on the following scale: 0 (no calculus present), 1 (supragingival calculus covering not more than one third of the exposed tooth surface), 2 (supragingival calculus covering more than one third but not more than two thirds of the exposed tooth surface or the presence of individual flecks of subgingival calculus around the cervical portion of the tooth or both) and 3 (supragingival calculus covering more than two thirds of the exposed tooth surface or a continuous heavy band of subgingival calculus around the cervical portion of the tooth or both).
All measurements were performed using acrylic stents to ensure reproducible placement of the periodontal probe (PCP 15 UNC, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Failure rate during 1-year follow-up A retainer with at least one composite pad detachment was considered to be a failure during a 1-year follow-up period. When there was no wire breakage or deformation, the tooth surfaces were cleaned and bonding was completed using a direct technique.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
🇹🇷Denizli, Turkey