Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05616884
NCT05616884Enrolling By InvitationNot Applicable

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Fixed Bearing Unicondylar Medial Knee Replacement

Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: July 8, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Knee Society Score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The primary study objective is to evaluate a cementless partial knee system that has a modular 3-D printed porous metal tibial component and a cemented partial knee system. The hypothesis is that at minimum 2-year follow-up, fixed bearing medial partial knee replacements using cementless and cemented fixation will demonstrate no differences in clinical outcome.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical trial of 100 patients will be enrolled by invitation of the principal investigator. Inclusion criteria include patients 18-85 years old, patients receiving a medial fixed bearing partial knee replacement and patients deemed suitable for both cemented and cementless fixation after review of the preoperative radiographs. Minimum two-year outcome will be analyzed, and long-term follow-up will continue to 5 years.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age18-85 years old
  • •medial fixed bearing partial knee replacement
  • •bone suitable for both cemented and cementless fixation after review of the preoperative radiographs.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Non-English speakers
  • •current smokers
  • •grossly porotic bone
  • •advanced other compartment arthritis at the time of surgery necessitating a total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
  • •previous high tibial osteotomy with prior hardware
  • •patients who are randomized but are deemed unsuitable to receive the assigned implant by the surgeon due to bone quality or bone cuts

Arms & Interventions

Cementless

Experimental

Cementless fixation partial knee replacement

Intervention: Cementless fixation (Procedure)

Cemented

Active Comparator

Cemented fixation partial knee replacement

Intervention: Cementless fixation (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Knee Society Score

Time Frame: 2 years postoperative

Clinical score for knee status and function. (0-100 scale, with 0 being the worst score and 100 being the best score.)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Kevin B. Fricka, MD

Principal Investigator

Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Cemented vs. Cementless Unicompartmental... | Clinical Trial