Comparison of the use of electrocautery and ultrasonic shearer in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- To assess complications of electrocautery And ultrasonic device in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard operation for benign gallbladder stone diseases.
Till early 2000s, Monopolar cautery has been the most commonly used energy device to dissect and coagulate tissue while performing laparoscopic procedures, also widely used in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Electrocautery being more intensely heat generating, is being associated with thermal injuries locally and to distant structures, excessive smoke production, arcing with metallic sleeve and/or port.
Ultrasonic dissector, introduced in 1992, is increasingly being used and suggested as alternatives to electrocautery in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
this study is to assess and compare electrocautery and ultrasonic device in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Stratified randomization
- Masking
- Participant Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients of gall bladder disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Liver cirrhosis Bleeding disorders Pregnancy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
To assess complications of electrocautery And ultrasonic device in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Time Frame: At the end of 15 months
Secondary Outcomes
- To note & record operative time(To evaluate hospital stay and time taken for recovery in both devices)