MedPath

Association Between Ankle Dorsiflexion and Frontal Projection Angle in PFPS

Completed
Conditions
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Interventions
Other: frontal projection angle, ankle dorsiflexion
Registration Number
NCT03897569
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The study will investigate an association between ankle dorsiflexion and altered frontal knee kinematics during step down test in patients with PFPS.

Detailed Description

Altered frontal and transverse plane hip kinematics during single leg weight-bearing tasks are thought to be important contributors to patellofemoral pain (PFP). The closed chain nature of single leg tasks means that hip kinematics can be influenced by more distal mechanics, such as foot pronation.

One of the often-studied distal movements theorized to cause PFPS is pronation of the subtalar joint. Pronation is a tri-planar movement that includes dorsiflexion, eversion, and abduction of the foot. Many studies have examined eversion characteristics of PFPS patients, but the dorsiflexion aspect of the movement has been shown to be a possible risk factor, restricting dorsiflexion was shown to increase medial knee displacement in young healthy adults. Conversely, when available dorsiflexion ROM is increased, medial knee displacement is thought to decrease.

Patients with PFPS were observed to have a decreased DFROM (dorsiflexion range of motion) as compared to normal individuals, though this topic has not thoroughly been investigated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Anterior or retropatellar knee pain from at least 2 of the following Activities : (1) prolonged sitting; (2) stair climbing; (3) squatting; (4) running; (5) kneeling; and (6) hopping/jumping.
  2. Insidious onset of symptoms unrelated to a traumatic incident and persistent for at least 6weeks.
  3. VAS equal to or greater than 3.
  4. Age of the subject 18-35 years to limit the possibility that PFPS over age 35 may have been complicated by arthritic changes, and also the subjects should have closed epiphyseal growth plates.
  5. BMI under 30 kg/m2, both gender

For the control group, subjects were recruited to this study if they had:

  1. No previous history or diagnosis of knee pathology.
  2. No pain with any of the above-mentioned provocative activities.
  3. No history of lower limb or spinal pathology.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. A history of any of the following condition: meniscal or other intraarticular pathologic conditions; cruciate or collateral ligament involvement.
  2. A history of traumatic patellar subluxation or dislocation.
  3. Previous surgery in the lower extremities within the 12 months prior to participation in the study.
  4. Any balance impairments are secondary to a vestibular or neurological disorder or secondary to the use of medication.
  5. Any lower limb bony/congenital deformity

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
patellofemoral pain syndromefrontal projection angle, ankle dorsiflexiontwenty subjects with anterior or retropatellar knee pain from at least 2 of the following Activities : (1) prolonged sitting; (2) stair climbing; (3) squatting; (4) running; (5) kneeling; and (6) hopping/jumping.
controlfrontal projection angle, ankle dorsiflexiontwenty-six asymptomatic subject will be recruited for this study and should have no pain or other relevant clinical symptoms in the lower quadrant
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Frontal knee kinematic20 minutes

The knee kinematic will be measured by using digital video camera using single leg squat during functional step down test

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ankle mobility20 minutes

Ankle dorsiflexion ROM will be assessed by bubble inclinometer during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Physical therapy, Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath