MedPath

Efficacy of Endoscopic Covered Metal Stenting for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstructio

Not Applicable
Conditions
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO)
Registration Number
JPRN-UMIN000020539
Lead Sponsor
agoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

o significant difference was observed between the U-SEMS and C-SEMS groups with respect to technical success, clinical success, GOO score or time to stent dysfunction. Stent migration was significantly more frequent in patients with C-SEMS. Karnofsky performance status, chemotherapy, peritoneal dissemination, and stent underexpansion were associated significantly with poor GOO score improvement in multivariable analyses, but stent type was not. In subgroup analyses, insufficient stent expansion was an independent factor in patients with U-SEMS, but not in C-SEMS. In the insufficient stent expansion subgroup, C-SEMS was associated significantly with superior clinical improvement compared with U-SEMS. Insufficient stent expansion was observed more frequently in patients with gastrointestinal obstruction due to anastomotic sites or metastatic cancer. In conclusion, no clinical difference, apart from stent migration, was observed between patients with U-SEMS and C-SEMS. Gastrointestinal obstruction due to an anastomotic site or metastatic cancer may be an indication for C-SEMS use to improve oral intake after SEMS placement.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Complete: follow-up complete
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
126
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not obtained the consent

Study & Design

Study Type
Observational
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath