Comparison between Postanal Repair and levatorplasty in Treatment of Rectal Prolapse

Not Applicable

• Conditions: K62.3; Rectal prolapse.; Rectal prolapse

• Registration Number: IRCT20130826014483N11
• Lead Sponsor: Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 7 February 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

Patients 18 to 80 years old
Patients who have consented to the implementation of the study
Patients who are candidates for Altemeier restoration

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who did not consent to participate in the study
Patients who are candidates for rectal prolapse repair with other methods

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Improvement of patient's symptoms and incontinence after discomfort in two groups of Baya without post-anal repair and levatoroplasty. Timepoint: Patients are followed up in six times, one time before surgery and five times after surgery. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;The recurrence rate of rectal prolapse after surgery in two groups with or without post-anal repair and levatoroplasty. Timepoint: Patients are followed up in six times, one time before surgery and five times after surgery. Method of measurement: questionnaire.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Anastomotic dehiscence, stenosis, 3-month mortality after Eltamayer Bayabadon post-anal repair and levatoroplasty surgery. Timepoint: Patients are followed up in six times, one time before surgery and five times after surgery. Method of measurement: questionnaire.