Comparison of Brugger's Relief Exercises Versus Kinesio Taping at Craniovertebral Angle on Forward Head Posture

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Forward Head Posture

• Registration Number: NCT06845696
• Lead Sponsor: Riphah International University

Brief Summary

The aim of this research is to compare the effect of Brugger relief exercise versus Kinesio taping at craniovertebral angle on forward head posture. Randomized controlled trials done at we care physical therapy clinic Islamabad. The sample size was 28. The subjects were divided in two groups, 14 subjects in Kinesio taping group and 14 in Brugger relief exercise group. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability purposive sampling technique. Only 20-40 years people with forward head posture having craniovertebral angle less than 50° degrees were included. Tools used in the study is protractor app. Data will be analyzed through SPSS 21

Detailed Description

Forward head posture (FHP) is a common condition characterized by abnormal cervical spine, leading to non-specific neck pain (NNP). FHP affects millions of people worldwide, causing pain, reduced productivity and quality of life. Current treatments for NNP associated with FHP include exercise programs and Kinesio taping, but there is limited evidence comparing their effectiveness.

The Brugger relief exercises (BRE) consist of a set of exercises designed to target the cervical spine and adjacent muscles with the goal of enhancing posture, alleviating discomfort, and improving functionality. In contrast, Kinesio taping (KT) is a non-invasive and painless method that involves applying gentle traction to the skin, purportedly leading to the reduction of pain and inflammation. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of BRE versus KT on CVA due to FHP. This research will offer important information on the effectiveness of BRE and KT, guiding healthcare providers and patients in selecting the best treatment for FHP-related NNP. The results will support the creation of evidence-backed protocols for addressing FHP-related NNP, ultimately leading to better treatment results and improved quality of life for those affected

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2025-01-22
• Status Verified: 2025-02
• Study First Submitted: 2025-02-20
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-02-20
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-02-20
• Study First Posted: 2025-02-25
• Last Update Posted: 2025-02-25
• Primary Completion: 2025-09-20
• Study Completion: 2025-09-20

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 28

Inclusion Criteria

• Both gender
• Patients whose age lies between 20 and 40
• Forward head posture with craniovertebral angle less than 50° degrees

Exclusion Criteria

• Individuals with pre-existing musculoskeletal conditions affecting posture e.g. scoliosis, Scheuermann's disease.
• Those currently undergoing physical therapy or other posture correction treatments.
• Pregnant individuals, due to potential physiological changes affecting posture.
• Subjects with a history of significant spinal or neck injuries.
• No neurological disease (e.g. cervical radiculopathy, SCI).
• Patients were excluded who shows positive result to spurling test, ULTT, Allen test.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
CRANIOVERTEBRAL ANGLE	from baseline to 4th week	This angle is used to assess the forward head posture of the participants. It involves measuring the angle between a horizontal line and a line connecting the C7 vertebrae and the tragus of ear by protractor app.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

We Care Physical Therapy Clinic; 🇵🇰 Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan