Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT01976546
NCT01976546
Completed
Not Applicable

Intubation With McGrath Video Laryngoscope and Boedeker Intubation Foreceps in a Population of Patients With Predictors of Difficult Airway, an Observational Pilot Study

Rigshospitalet, Denmark1 site in 1 country25 target enrollmentSeptember 2013
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsPatients With One or More Predictors of Difficult Airway

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Patients With One or More Predictors of Difficult Airway
Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Enrollment
25
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to intubation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes have been widely studied, and is now often used in the management of difficult airways.

Videolaryngoscopes with angulated blades can improve laryngeal view, however this does not always match with a higher intubation succes. To adress this matter the aim of this study is gathering experience with intubation with mcgrath videolaryngoscope and a blade-shape intubation foreceps (Boedeker intubation foreceps, Karl Storz, Germany).

The hypothesis is that intubation with this combination is easy and can be a good alternative when using the McGrath videolaryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult airway.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2013
End Date
December 2013
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Camilla Strøm

M.D

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •patients scheduled for elective surgery
  • •age over 18 or more
  • •planned intubation with mcgrath videolaryngoscope
  • •informed conscent obtained
  • •patients are
  • •patients shall be able to read and understand Danish

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients planned to awake intubation
  • •hypoxia defined by saturation under 90% without oxygen supply
  • •patients with oxygentreatment at home
  • •patients that need a wired tube
  • •patients that need a preshaped tube
  • •patients that need crash induction
  • •use of gastric tube

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to intubation

Time Frame: within one day

Secondary Outcomes

  • Sore throat(within 2 days)
  • succesful intubation(within one day)
  • Damage on teeth(2 days)
  • Intubation difficulty(within one day)
  • Intubation conditions(within one day)
  • Intubation attempts(within one day)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Not Applicable
Intubation using VieScope, video laryngoscopes and conventional laryngoscopy in simulated severe hemorrhage in the airways - a randomized, controlled model studydifficult airway
DRKS00023412niklinik Köln - Anästhesie und operative Intensivmedizin35
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Routine Endotracheal Intubation With McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScopeIntubation
NCT02997488Ajou University School of Medicine140
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Intubation using VieScope, video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy in simulated difficult airway - a randomized, controlled model studyDIFFICULTAIRWAY
DRKS00024968niklinik Köln - Anästhesie und operative Intensivmedizin35
Completed
Not Applicable
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct LaryngoscopyIntubationLaryngoscopy
NCT04701762The Cleveland Clinic12,701
Unknown
Not Applicable
First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct LaryngoscopeIntubation
NCT03887897Chinese University of Hong Kong1,586