The Interaction of Flavor With Nicotine Form in Adult Smokers
- Conditions
- Nicotine Dependence
- Interventions
- Drug: Nicotine formOther: E-cigarette experimental flavor
- Registration Number
- NCT04262817
- Lead Sponsor
- Yale University
- Brief Summary
This study seeks to elucidate the impact of e-cigarette flavor on subjective effects and nicotine exposure from e-cigarettes containing different forms of nicotine.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- At least 21 years old, able to read and write, use of combustible
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description E-cigarette flavor Nicotine form In this arm, participants will receive two experimental e-cigarette flavors E-cigarette nicotine form Nicotine form In this arm, participants will receive two forms of nicotine in an e-cigarette E-cigarette flavor E-cigarette experimental flavor In this arm, participants will receive two experimental e-cigarette flavors E-cigarette nicotine form E-cigarette experimental flavor In this arm, participants will receive two forms of nicotine in an e-cigarette
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Liking of E-cigarette Overall up to 3 weeks Following each puff, each participant was assessed to determine if they liked/disliked the overall e-cigarette experience using the Labeled Hedonic Scale (LHS), a bipolar category-ratio scale with 5 symmetrical semantic labels positioned on the scale per their semantic magnitude that ranges from -100 (Most Disliked) to 100 (Most Liked) with "Neither Liked nor Disliked" at the midpoint.
Changes in Liking of E-cigarette Flavor up to 3 weeks Following each puff, each participant was assessed to determine if they liked/disliked the flavors in the e-cigarette experience using the Labeled Hedonic Scale (LHS), a bipolar category-ratio scale with 5 symmetrical semantic labels positioned on the scale per their semantic magnitude that ranges from -100 (Most Disliked) to 100 (Most Liked) with "Neither Liked nor Disliked" at the midpoint.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method gLMS: Irritation up to 3 weeks Immediately following each puff, participants rated the sensory effects they experienced (harshness/irritation, coolness, sweetness) "right now" on the general version of the Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). The gLMS is a category ratio scale with 7 semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically per their empirically determined semantic magnitudes, with responses coded on a 0-100 scale. The scores have been log transformed with responses coded on a 0-4.6 natural log transformed scale. The higher the score, the higher the intensity for the outcome (i.e., irritation, sweetness, coolness).
Number of Puffs up to 3 weeks The number of puffs on each device were counter per participant across each level of the study design. The scores have been log transformed.
gLMS: Sweetness up to 3 weeks Immediately following each puff, participants rated the sensory effects they experienced (harshness/irritation, coolness, sweetness) "right now" on the general version of the Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). The gLMS is a category ratio scale with 7 semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically per their empirically determined semantic magnitudes, with responses coded on a 0-100 scale. The scores have been log transformed with responses coded on a 0-4.6 natural log transformed scale. The higher the score, the higher the intensity for the outcome (i.e., irritation, sweetness, coolness).
gLMS: Coolness up to 3 weeks Immediately following each puff, participants rated the sensory effects they experienced (harshness/irritation, coolness, sweetness) "right now" on the general version of the Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). The gLMS is a category ratio scale with 7 semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically per their empirically determined semantic magnitudes, with responses coded on a 0-100 scale. The scores have been log transformed with responses coded on a 0-4.6 natural log transformed scale. The higher the score, the higher the intensity for the outcome (i.e., irritation, sweetness, coolness).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pierce Laboratory
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States