MedPath

Validation of a Novel Simplified Head up Tilt Test (HUTT) Protocol Versus the Conventional Protocol

Not Applicable
Conditions
Syncope;Heat Induced
Syncope
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Conventional HUTT
Diagnostic Test: Fast HUTT
Registration Number
NCT05029323
Lead Sponsor
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the positivity rate associated with a novel simplified Tilt-Table (TT) test protocol versus the conventional TT protocol

Detailed Description

All patients with unexplained syncope at initial evaluation with indication to perform a Head up tilt test (HUTT) will be randomized to "conventional" HUTT protocol or "fast" HUTT protocol characterized by a stabilization phase of 5 min in the supine position; a passive phase of 10 min at a tilt angle of 60 degrees; a provocation phase of further 10 min after 300 micrograms NTG sublingual spray. The novel simplified "fast" HUTT protocol has been designed to provide non inferior positivity rates as compared with the conventional protocol in the selected population.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
500
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients with unexplained syncope at initial evaluation and indication to perform HUTT
Exclusion Criteria
  • No informed consent
  • PM/ICD device recipients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional HUTTConventional HUTTAll patients with unexplained syncope at initial evaluation with indication to perform a Head up tilt test (HUTT) randomized to "conventional" HUTT protocol characterized by a stabilization phase of 5 min in the supine position; a passive phase of 10 min at a tilt angle of 60 degrees; aprovocation phase of further 10 min after 300 micrograms NTG sublingual spray.
Fast HUTTFast HUTTAll patients with unexplained syncope at initial evaluation with indication to perform a Head up tilt test (HUTT) randomized to "fast" HUTT protocol characterized by a stabilization phase of 5 min in the supine position; a passive phase of 10 min at a tilt angle of 60 degrees; a provocation phase of further 10 min after 300 micrograms NTG sublingual spray.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
HUTT positivity rate during passive phasethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The study endpoint is the number of patients who experienced syncope during the passive phase of HUTT.

HUTT positivity rate during active phasethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The study endpoint is the number of patients who experienced syncope during the active phase of HUTT.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The type of HUTT-induced syncope during passive phasethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The secondary study endpoint is the number of patients with cardioinhibitory HUTT-syncope during the passive phase of HUTT.

The type of HUTT-induced syncope during active phasethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The secondary study endpoint is the number of patients with cardioinhibitory HUTT-syncope during the active phase of HUTT.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

🇮🇹

Naples, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath