Characterization of the IFN-I Response in Subjects Who Experienced Severe or Mild Forms of COVID-19
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Registration Number
- NCT06703034
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Brief Summary
Type I interferon (IFN-I) production is triggered by the detection of viral molecules, such as strands of viral RNA or DNA, by receptors known as PRRs (Pattern Recognition Receptors) present on many cell types. These interferons are secreted in minimal concentrations but can activate neighboring cells to secrete over 700 proteins with antiviral properties (inhibition of viral replication, destabilization of viral membranes, etc.). Thus, the IFN-I response serves as the immune system's first line of defense during a viral infection.
Very early in the COVID-19 pandemic, several research teams, including ours, identified a defect in the type I interferon response in about one in five subjects with severe COVID-19. In-depth studies have shown that 5 to 20% of these patients with severe COVID-19 disease have genetic mutations affecting genes involved in the activation cascade of the IFN-I pathway or produce autoantibodies that neutralize IFN-I, significantly impairing the effectiveness of their IFN-I response.
However, to date, not all causes of IFN-I response alteration are clearly identified, and 80% of patients suffering from severe COVID-19 do not appear to have evident genetic predispositions or anti-IFN-I autoantibodies, with the techniques currently available. This suggests the presence of other risk factors or causes that could potentially lead to alterations in the IFN-I response.
The gut microbiota is recognized for its influence on host health and immunity. SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2) infection has been associated with altered gut microbiota and correlated with inflammatory and immune responses. However, the association between dysbiosis and IFN-I response has yet to be studied in humans.
Therefore, to improve the management of individuals affected by viral respiratory infections, it seems essential to explore alterations in the IFN-I response to identify individuals potentially at risk of developing severe forms. It is known that a failure in the IFN-I response in the early stages of a viral infection leads to uncontrolled viral replication, which may result in a severe form of the disease. Since this IFN-I response is essential for controlling all viral infections, regardless of the virus involved, the investigators hypothesize that this IFN-I deficiency could be responsible for severe infections from various respiratory viruses that may lead to severe forms, even though a direct association between IFN-I deficiency and higher mortality risk has only been reported for a few viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza.
Furthermore, the investigators consider the possibility of other underlying causes of IFN-I deficiencies, distinct from the already observed anti-IFN-I autoantibodies and genetic mutations. To achieve this, the investigators hypothesize that the use of functional immune tests could reveal these other alterations.
By identifying these alterations in individuals, the investigators hope to more accurately predict their propensity to develop severe forms of viral infections.
Biological samples will be collected specifically for the study, outside of a healthcare procedure. No biological sample in biocollections coming from COVID-ser and NOSO-COR IMMUNO studies and the RNIPH study (Research Not Involving Human Persons) named MIR-COVID will be used for this new protocol.
Patients who experienced :
* mild forms of COVID-19 during the first wave, without any prior vaccination, selected from the pre-existing COVID-Ser cohort (ClinicalTrial no. NCT04341142)
* severe forms of COVID-19 during the first wave, without any prior vaccination, selected from the pre-existing NOSO-COR IMMUNO cohort (ClinicalTrial no. NCT04637867) and the RNIPH study (Research Not Involving Human Persons) named MIR-COVID (compliance with MR004 n°20_097_v2) could be recruited.
Biological samples will be collected specifically for the study, outside of a healthcare procedure. No biological sample in biocollections coming from COVID-ser and NOSO-COR IMMUNO studies and the RNIPH study (Research Not Involving Human Persons) named MIR-COVID will be used for this new protocol.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Participant aged at least 18 years
- Previously included in the COVID-ser or NOSO-COR IMMUNO study as well as in the RNIPH study (Research Not Involving Human Persons) named MIR-COVID
- Weight of 50 kg or more
- Current infection symptoms
- Immunosuppression defined by: bone marrow transplant within the past 24 months, chemotherapy within the past 6 months, HIV infection with CD4 <200/mm³ or <15%, corticosteroid therapy for more than 2 weeks with a daily dose over 10 mg of prednisolone equivalent, immunosuppressive treatment administered within the previous 3 months (6 months for rituximab), aplasia, asplenia, or splenectomy
- Antibiotic use within the month prior to the inclusion visit
- Probiotic use within the last 15 days prior to the inclusion visit
- Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding woman
- Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Person receiving psychiatric care
- Person admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research
- Person under guardianship or curators
- Person not affiliated with a social security scheme or similar coverage
- Patient participating in another ongoing interventional research study at inclusion"
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method IFN-I score measured post-stimulation by Influenza A virus (IAV) in vitro At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the score IFN-I, measured by assessing the expression of a selection of IFN-I-stimulated genes, between the two groups of interest (mild or severe form).
Given the limited advancement of studies on the interferon score following stimulation, no scoring scale is currently established. However, an increase in the score would be associated with a functional response to stimulation, indicating the absence of alterations in the targeted interferon induction pathway.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method IFN-I response induced post-stimulation in vitro by Poly I At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the score IFN-I, measured by assessing the expression of a selection of IFN-I-stimulated genes, between the two groups of interest (mild or severe form).
Given the limited advancement of studies on the interferon score following stimulation, no scoring scale is currently established. However, an increase in the score would be associated with a functional response to stimulation, indicating the absence of alterations in the targeted interferon induction pathway.Induction of immune pathways post-stimulation at a transcriptomic/proteomic level on a panel of genes and cytokines/chemokines specifically involved in key processes of the immune response At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of gene expression levels, fold-changes expression, activation levels (Z-scores, p-value, FDR), and comparison of the concentrations of secreted cytokines/chemokines between the 2 groups of interest (mild or severe form)
Presence of anti-IFN-I autoantibodies At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the presence and levels of anti-IFN-I autoantibodies between the two groups
Presence of other serum anti-cytokine autoantibodies detected by multiplex ELISA (Infinity Biomarker) At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the presence and levels of other serum anti-cytokine antibodies between the two groups (mild or severe form)
Presence of genetic mutations affecting antiviral immune pathways At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the frequency of genetic mutations affecting genes involved in the IFN-I response detected by sequencing between the two groups (mild or severe form)
Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation to the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by the live attenuated Influenza A virus (IAV). At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation and the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by the live attenuated Influenza A virus (IAV), Poly I:C, resiquimod (R848), diABZI, and IFNα
Propensity of individuals with a low IFN score post-stimulation by IAV to develop severe viral infections in the two winters following inclusion After 2 winters (at last month 18) Correlation of the IFN score post-stimulation by IAV with severe infectious episodes during the two winters following inclusion
Overall composition of the gut microbiota and possibly the metabolome, depending on the intensity of the functional immune response post-stimulation. At inclusion visit (Day 0) Correlation between the composition of the gut microbiota and possibly the metabolome and the immune response post-stimulation
IFN-I response induced post-stimulation in vitro by resiquimod (R848) At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the score IFN-I, measured by assessing the expression of a selection of IFN-I-stimulated genes, between the two groups of interest (mild or severe form)
IFN-I response induced post-stimulation in vitro by diABZI At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the score IFN-I, measured by assessing the expression of a selection of IFN-I-stimulated genes, between the two groups of interest (mild or severe form)
IFN-I response induced post-stimulation in vitro by IFNα At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the score IFN-I, measured by assessing the expression of a selection of IFN-I-stimulated genes, between the two groups of interest (mild or severe form)
Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation to the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by Poly I:C At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation and the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by the live attenuated Influenza A virus (IAV), Poly I:C, resiquimod (R848), diABZI, and IFNα
Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation to the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by resiquimod (R848) At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation and the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by the live attenuated Influenza A virus (IAV), Poly I:C, resiquimod (R848), diABZI, and IFNα
Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation to the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by diABZI At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation and the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by the live attenuated Influenza A virus (IAV), Poly I:C, resiquimod (R848), diABZI, and IFNα
Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation to the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by IFNα At inclusion visit (Day 0) Comparison of the blood and nasal IFN score in vivo without stimulation and the blood IFN score post-stimulation in vitro by the live attenuated Influenza A virus (IAV), Poly I:C, resiquimod (R848), diABZI, and IFNα
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
🇫🇷Lyon, France